On Air Now

Listen Now


Mostly Cloudy
H -° L 46°
  • clear-night
    Current Conditions
    Mostly Cloudy. H -° L 46°
  • cloudy-day
    Mostly Cloudy. H -° L 46°
  • cloudy-day
    Mostly Cloudy. H 66° L 57°

News on-demand

00:00 | 00:00


Traffic on-demand

00:00 | 00:00


Weather on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

DawgFamily? Nation’s No. 7 CB Dontae Manning details his long-time interest in UGA

DawgFamily? Nation’s No. 7 CB Dontae Manning details his long-time interest in UGA

DawgFamily? Nation’s No. 7 CB Dontae Manning details his long-time interest in UGA

DawgFamily? Nation’s No. 7 CB Dontae Manning details his long-time interest in UGA

Want to attack every day with the latest UGA football recruiting info? That's what the Intel brings. This offering is a chance to get to know senior CB target, Dontae Manning. There's a lot to this young man aside from an abiding interest in playing for UGA.

Dontae Manning has made a lot of "OMG" plays for his Raytown High (Kansas City, Mo.) football team. He plans to take an "OV" to UGA in December. Georgia coach Kirby Smart has even compared him to a current NFL star.


There's an even better set of initials out there that shows what the nation's No. 7 cornerback prospect (247Sports Composite) might mean to even the nation's most elite programs.


Long. Live. Brent.

That "LLB" has meant something to Manning and his Raytown Bluejay community. It still means a lot.

Brent Kuhnhenn passed this month after a long fight with cancer. He was the father-in-law of the head coach at Raytown. His trial with his illness sparked a "BrentStrong" movement within that community. Kuhnhenn's fight led to more than earrings with a logo for his cancer fight. It sparked hashtags, helmet stickers and even widespread T-shirt sales around Raytown.

It also inspired an Under Armour All-American with blistering speed and playmaking ability.

It still does.

"I mean everybody knows somebody who has lost somebody to a battle with cancer," Manning said. "Or they know that cancer patient personally. It really affected me here because I also had family members that I lost because of cancer. Just being around Brent while he was alive and walking on the Earth affected me. He was just so motivated it motivated me."

"He was still coming to games. Still living his life. Losing him was a big piece of me. It was a big piece of why I played football and why I still play football."

During the waning weeks of his life, Kunhhenn was a fixture at Bluejay events. That wasn't much different than a lot of his time around the school, but it was different.

It led to moments where strong young men fed off the example he was setting. Even in declining health.

"I've got two memories," Manning said. "There was one where I scored my second touchdown or something like that and he was just right there and he gave me the biggest high-five and hug. Or there was a picture when I was walking to hug him and he was like I love you' and that was one of my favorite memories of him."

That moment was about a month beforeKuhnhenn passed away. He will cherish it. Always.

There's a sincerity to Manning that is uncommon compared to a lot of the prospects on the recruiting trail. His July de-commitment tweet from Oklahoma is a clear expression of that.

We've been discussing Manning for a few weeks on the DawgNation message board forum and our live weekly "Before the Hedges" show on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.

The young man he aims to be is on vivid display in the above examples. But he can really play, too.

Dontae Manning: The quick-hit things to know

Manning is going to go to Georgia. At least in December for an official visit.

That's been the case for over a month. He already has strong lines of communication with current members of the team.

Let's quickly rep out a lot of quick info bursts about Manning:

  • Very good size for the cornerback spot: 6 feet and 193 pounds.
  • Plays all over the field for his HS: Offense. Defense. Special teams. Stands out as an elite prospect in all phases.
  • State champion level track speed with strong times (10.67) in the 100 and 200 (21.96) meters during his junior season. Has also cleared 22 feet in the long jump. Manning is a 4-time All-State selection in track.
  • Still considers Oklahoma as a major contender for his decision
  • Has taken officials to Oklahoma and Texas A&M already. Recently nailed down Arizona State, Oregon and UGA as his final officials.
  • He can enroll early, but will not. He still wants to still have his senior year in track.
  • As of now, he plans to make a silent commitment sometime prior to the early signing period. He will sign with his future school during that stretch but keep that on the hush until he shares his decision at the Under Armour All-American Game. He will then have a signing ceremony at Raytown in February.
  • Plans a major which will either bring it all back to sports (Sports Marketing, Communications) or a business management degree pursuit with a minor in graphic design.
  • What position does he aim to play? "Anywhere the coaches put me I feel like that will be in my best interests to play and do my best. That's where the team will need me the most."
  • He expanded on that thought. "Where ever they put me, I am going to ball out. Whether it is at safety. Whether it is at cornerback. Even if it is in a Wildcat' package, then I know that I will be successful."
  • Said he's been hand-timed at 10.4 seconds in the 100 meters. That's a goal for his laser time during state track season in the spring.
  • His pure 247Sports rating has him even higher. Manning is rated as the nation's No. 3 cornerback prospect and No. 29 player overall. He is the No. 1 prospect from the state of Missouri.

Check out his junior film. It won't take too long to figure out why Manning said Kirby Smart compared him to NFL Pro Bowler Jalen Ramsey.

Dontae Manning: Where UGA sits and Oklahoma looms

Manning detailed why he reversed his commitment to Oklahoma over the summer.

"Many people thought I de-committed because I hated OU or I felt differently about them," he said. "Really I felt like I needed to start over because I didn't do my recruitment right. I didn't really take the time out to look at depth charts and everything like that."

"OU remains really like my number one choice right now or right at the top of my decision. But that's why I de-committed."

That said, he feels Oklahoma still recruits him as hard as any other school.

"I would say out of all the schools it is still Oklahoma," he said. "They treat me like I am their son. I get texts from coaches from Oklahoma every day."

The Bulldogs were among the top three schools hitting him up at this time.

Georgia was already recruiting him at the time he de-committed. The Bulldogs have been recruiting him since his sophomore year. That's when the staff saw him at a team camp he attended with a teammate.

"It really started like my sophomore year," he said.

Why is Georgia now a finalist?

"Just Georgia being an SEC school and the chance of winning a national championship," he said. "Then them just spitting out DBs into the league, too. I have a good relationship with the head coach and even the position coaches which just got there."

"I really have a good relationship with the program."

He said that he speaks with Smart on the phone almost every week.

"With coach Smart, when we get on the phone he really doesn't talk about the football aspect," he said. "More of who I reminded him of. As far as Jalen Ramsey. He went on to talk about track speed and how I am lengthy and how I can be used basically anywhere on the field."

Where did that "Dawg family" come from on that above tweet?

"That's because I really know the program," he said. "I reached out to a couple of players at Georgia. Just having conversations about the program and everything like that. That feels like family. That's why I used that term. Then they treat me like family, too. We text like family. It is just like that."

When those talks happen, those Georgia defensive backs shoot him straight. No chaser. Those details include the plan for how UGA spits its DBs into the NFL.

When he visits UGA in December, he will want to see:

  • How the position meetings go
  • How the players interact with one another and the staff
  • Getting the real 1-on-1 about the program from the current Bulldogs

How hard will his decision be?

"I think it is hard because it has to do with my whole entire life," he said. "But at the end of the day, I feel like I am going to know. I will. Because that will be the place that feels like home."

Manning doesn't know his choice right now. He feels he has more research to do.

"I'm looking for an overall family," he said. "Someplace where I fall in love with the campus. When my parents see it, too. They just fall in love with it. A place they would approve of minus all of the football aspects."


DawgFamily? Nation’s No. 7 CB Dontae Manning details his long-time interest in UGA

What motivates Dontae Manning

The SEC grind is grueling. It almost becomes too taxing for a player to truly excel when they don't have a "why" that fills their life with a burning desire to be great.

Manning also a purposeful horizon there.

"Where I'm from as far as Kansas City, not a lot of people I would say make it out' or have a positive outlet to display their talents," Manning said. "I would say that motivates me. But I also do it for the people that I have lost and the people who can't play football. That's maybe due to an injury or the people who wish they could but maybe are not just cut out for it. I just play for family and what I could potentially be in this game."

His teammates call him "Crazy 8" and "Speed" or "Tae" and "Locksmith 8" at times. That last one deserves further review from the cool nickname department.

"It is a lockdown thing," Manning said. "Then only I've got the keys. If you are open, then it means I only want you to be open for a period of time."

That's proof positive he's a cornerback at heart. It sounds like something Deion Sanders might say. To open the window in coverage just long enough to lay the bait. To get a quarterback to risk a downfield throw.

"Yes, sir," Manning said. "That's it."

Manning's film does not equate to a china shop cornerback. Or a 7-on-7 hero. His favorite play on his highlight tape has nothing to do with offense or defense.

He flashes brightly on special teams.

"It was on kickoff running down the field, getting by a blocker and then picking up the ball carrier and then slamming them on the ground," he told DawgNation.

There's something bigger here for him with the game than his highlight-reel touchdowns.

"I think the big thing for me now is seeing my teammates succeed," he said. "I'm one of the chilliest or funniest 18-year-olds you will ever meet. I am always on my friends to excel. My friends know me for trying to put them on to another college coach to get their name out there. Just even those simple retweets every day. I want my circle to succeed more than anything. I love it when people succeed around me. Especially the younger guys and the young kids. If you see me around kids, then that's when you will see the real me."

The post DawgFamily? Nation's No. 7 CB Dontae Manning details his long-time interest in UGA appeared first on DawgNation.

Read More


  • A Florida woman was accused of animal cruelty after investigators found seven malnourished horses at her house. One of the animals later died. >> Read more trending news  Investigators were notified about the horses Oct. 24 and met with Nicole Hutchins, 32, in an attempt to improve the animals’ conditions, the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office said.  However, deputies and Pasco County Fire Rescue workers were called back to Hutchins’ home Wednesday to help with a horse that was unable to get up. The horse later died. Investigators took custody of the remaining six horses and will petition the court for possession of them in order to auction them.  Hutchins was arrested and charged with animal cruelty. 
  • Tilli Buchanan and her husband were sweaty and itchy after spending the day installing insulation in their Utah garage, so they stripped off their long-sleeved shirts to cool down, according to her attorneys. More than a year later -- though that timeline is in some dispute -- Buchanan, 27, of West Valley City, finds herself in court, fighting lewdness charges filed against her in February because her young stepchildren saw her topless. If convicted of the three Class A misdemeanor charges against her, Buchanan could serve jail time and be forced to register as a sex offender for the next decade, the Salt Lake Tribune reported. Her husband, who was also shirtless, has not been charged with a crime. “If we are to lose this, she’s on the sex registry with child rapists and things of that nature,” her attorney, Randy Richards, told reporters. “The magnitude of the penalty on this is enormous.” Buchanan, who is also being represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah, was in court for a hearing on Tuesday, at which time her attorneys argued that Utah’s lewdness act is unconstitutional because it treats men and women differently. “What’s important to look at, to see, when you look at the statute, is there’s part of it that says this part of a woman is found inherently obscene and this part of a man isn’t,” ACLU attorney Leah Farrell told reporters after the hearing. “And that really sets up an unequal, unfair dichotomy.” District Judge Kara Pettit declined to rule from the bench, saying “it’s too important of an issue” for an immediate judgment, the Deseret News reported. Pettit said she would hand down a decision sometime within the next two months. According to Utah’s law against lewdness involving a child, a person can be convicted if he or she exposes his or her genitals, buttocks, anus or pubic area, or the female breast “below the top of the areola,” in front of a child. The law applies if the person does this in public or “in a private place under circumstances the person should know will likely cause affront or alarm or with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of the actor or the child.” Farrell said that standard is unfair to women because they have to do “mental calculus” to determine if going topless will cause alarm, while that same burden is not placed on men, the News reported. West Valley Deputy City Attorney Corey Sherwin, who is prosecuting Buchanan’s case, told the newspaper that Utah laws do not target women, but said nudity is understood to not only include “lower parts of the body” but also the female breast. He said the lewdness statute applies only to those who intentionally expose themselves around children. In court paperwork obtained by the Tribune, Sherwin argued that Buchanan stripped down in front of the children, boys ages 13 and 9 and a 10-year-old girl, after stating that, if her husband could go shirtless, she should be able to, as well. The documents alleged Buchanan, who Sherwin claimed was “under the influence of alcohol,” later told her husband she would only put her shirt back on if he showed her his penis, the Tribune said. The incident took place in late 2017 or early 2018, according to prosecutors. Buchanan said, however, that it may have taken place as early as the fall of 2016. >> Read more trending news  The Tribune reported that authorities became involved earlier this year during a Division of Child and Family Services investigation that did not involve Buchanan. The incident came to light during that unrelated probe and the children’s mother called police, saying she was alarmed by what had happened in front of the kids. Buchanan’s recollection of the incident differs greatly from the claims made by prosecutors. She said that, when the children came downstairs to find her without a shirt, she used the moment as a teaching experience for her stepchildren. She said she pointed out to the children that they were not made uncomfortable by their father’s bare chest. “This isn’t a sexual thing,” she recalled telling the children, according to the Tribune. “I should be able to wear exactly what my husband wears. You shouldn’t be embarrassed about this.” Listen to Tilli Buchanan speak following her court hearing below, courtesy of KSL in Salt Lake City. Richards argued earlier this year that Buchanan should not face charges for being shirtless in her own home while her husband escapes punishment or condemnation for the same behavior. “The fact that this was in the privacy of one’s own home is real troubling,” Richards told the Tribune in September. “Different people have different moral positions as far as nudity.” Richards’ argument has been based largely on a February opinion by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit Court, which upheld a lower court ruling that a Fort Collins, Colorado, ordinance banning women from going topless violated their 14th Amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law. Fox13 in Salt Lake City reported in September that the court narrowed its ruling in the case, Free the Nipple Fort Collins v. City of Fort Collins, to address solely the Fort Collins ordinance. West Valley City prosecutors cited that narrow scope during arguments in Buchanan’s case, arguing that the “Free the Nipple” ruling is more narrow than the ACLU might like. Read the court ruling in full below. Free the Nipple v Fort Collins by National Content Desk on Scribd The ruling, which made headlines nationwide, is slowly making its mark on other Utah cases, however. FOX 13 reported that attorneys with clients facing lewdness charges have begun citing the appeals court ruling in their own arguments. Buchanan said she was devastated by the criminal charges filed against her. “The moment I took to teach the kids, it was kind of smashed,” she told the Tribune. “Like you can’t teach kids this. In fact, you’re going to be charged for even bringing this up.” After Tuesday’s hearing, Buchanan told reporters she is hopeful at least a portion of the state’s lewdness law will be struck down. “Especially given it was in the privacy of my own home, my husband was right next to me, in the exact same manner that I was, and he’s not being prosecuted for it,” Buchanan said.
  • A former National Security Council official and a diplomat who says he overheard a conversation between President Donald Trump and ambassador Gordon Sondland are scheduled to testify Thursday in the week’s final impeachment inquiry hearing. >> Read more trending news  The testimony of Fiona Hill and David Holmes comes a day after Sondland offered explosive testimony in which he said he, Kurt Volker and Energy Secretary Rick Perry worked with Rudy Giuliani to pursue a 'quid pro quo' with Ukraine, dangling a possible White House meeting between Trump and the Ukrainian president in exchange for an announcement that Ukraine was to launch an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. According to Sondland, a second investigation into Ukraine-backed interference in the 2016 presidential election was also on the table. Hill, who testified in a closed-door session that she had concerns about Giuliani, and Holmes, who told Ukraine charge d’affaires William Taylor that he overheard a phone conversation between Sondland and Trump, will testify before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence beginning at 9 a.m. Livestream See the livestream below when the hearing starts. Live updates The public hearings are over 4:20 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Schiff has gaveled the hearing closed, and, so far, there is no word on anymore scheduled public hearings. Congress will be on Thanksgiving recess next week. When they come back, Democrats are expected to decide on articles of impeachment. Closing statements 3:50 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: The members of the committee have completed their questioning. Now, Nunes and Schiff will have closing statements. Nunes is giving a timeline of attacks against Trump dating back to 2015. Was there an investigation; did they meet? 3 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-New York, thanks Hill for her comments about personal attacks she has been under. Stefanik eventually asks Hill and Holmes if Ukraine received military aid. Yes, they both say. Was there an investigation into the Bidens? No, both answered. Did Trump meet with Zelensky at the U.N.? Yes, they said, though Holmes points out it was not in the Oval Office. Hill answers Weinstrup 2:15 p.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: After a Rep. Brad Weinstrup, R-Ohio, talks about how divisive the country has become because of the hearings, Hill urges the members of the committee and the American people to put aside partisan issues. “We need to be together again in 2020 so the American people can make a choice about the future and make their vote without any fear” that foreign countries are interfering in the election, Hill says. There wasn't a yelling match 1:45 p.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Sondland testified on Wednesday that a July 10 White House meeting had dissolved into a shouting match. “There was no yelling or shouting,” Hill says. “That’s some embellishment... Sondland was in an exchange with Vindman... ‘we have an agreement to have a meeting’.” “When I came in (to the Ward Room in the White House), Gordon Sondland was basically saying look, I have a deal with chief of staff Mulvaney that we have a meeting if the Ukrainians announce investigations of Burisma... “I cut it off right there... it was clear then that Burisma was code for the Bidens... “So I cut off this line and I said to Ambassador Sondland look... we have to properly prepare this... and we really shouldn’t be talking about this in front of our colleagues from Ukraine... “We asked our colleagues to wait outside of the door in the corridor. “I pushed back on ambassador Sondland. “Ambassador Sondland then said OK, fair enough. Ambassador Volker didn’t say anything at this particular juncture.” Vindman’s judgment 1:40 p.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Castor asks Hill about Tim Morrison’s testimony earlier this week that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s judgment was in question.  Vindman, while “excellent at his job,” did not have the political experience to handle the informal policy channel that was forming about Ukraine, Hill said. “That does not mean in any way that I was questioning his overall judgment or his expertise. He is excellent... this is a very different issue.”  Does Holmes know Lutschenko? 1:20 p.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Nunes asks Holmes if he knows journalist and former legislator Sergey Lutschenko. Holmes says yes. Nunes asks if he knows that Lutschenko produced the “black ledger” which allegedly contained damaging information against Trump. Holmes said, yes. Nunes asks Holmes if the black ledger is credible. Holmes said it is. Nunes says Robert Mueller did not consider it credible. Holmes: “I’m not aware that Bob Mueller did not find it credible,” but it was used as evidence in other criminal proceedings. Nunes: Didn’t Lutschenko want to hurt Trump? Holmes: “He has not said that to me. If he said that to you I’ll take your word for it.” Who put you in charge? 1:15 p.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Castor asks her about Sondland. Hill said she dealt with him as she worked on Ukraine matters as EU and Ukraine matters overlap. “It was perfectly logical that Ambassador Sondland would play some kind of role” on Ukraine, she said. However, Sondland seemed to be inserting himself in different matters, so she asked him what was going on. “I asked him quite bluntly” about his role, Hill said. “He said he was in charge of Ukraine, and I said ‘who put you in charge?’ and he said ‘the president’.” Nunes asks about the Steele dossier 1:09 p.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Nunes questions Hill and Holmes. He asks Hill if she knows Christopher Steele. Yes, she had met with him. Did she know of the Steele dossier and had she seen it before it was published. Yes, she said, a colleague at the Brookings Institute shared it with her the day before it was published.  Did she know who paid for it? Fusion GPS, Hill said. Nunes asks if she actually knows who commissioned it. She said she knew through the media that the Democratic National Committee had paid Fusion GPS for it. The hearing is set to resume 12:51 p.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: After an extended break allowing members to vote, the hearing looks set to resume. The hearing is recessed for a break 11:05 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: They are taking a break to vote on the House floor. The ‘drug deal’ quote 11 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Hill said she was told by Bolton after a July 10 meeting that she needed to go to John Eisenberg, White House counsel, and tell him that he, Bolton, was in “no way a part of this ‘drug deal’ that Sondland and Mulvaney had cooked up.” ‘A hand grenade' 10:50 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Hill, who worked closely with former chief of staff John Bolton, said she talked to him about Yovanovitch’s dismissal, with the help of Giuliani. “Ambassador Bolton had looked pained, indicated with body language that there was nothing he could do about it” then said, “Mr. Giuliani is a hand grenade that is going to blow everyone up.” Goldman asked her what that meant.  “That Mr. Giuliani was pushing views that would probably come back to haunt us, and that’s where we are today,” Hill said. ‘Predicated on other issues’ 10:40 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Hill is asked about the July 25 call and notes that she left the White House before the call took place. However, she said, “In the months leading up” to it, “it became very clear the White House meeting itself was being predicated on other issues, namely investigations and the questions about the election interference in 2016.” She said she found the call ‘surprising.” Hearing the phone call 10:30 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Goldman asks Holmes about the phone call and how Holmes was able to hear it. Holmes describes the call that happened on the terrace of a restaurant in Kyiv. Holmes said he heard Trump’s loud and distinctive voice and that Sondland held the phone out from his ear because the volume was so loud. What did he hear, Goldman asked. “He clarified whether he (Sondland) was in Ukraine... he said, ‘is he gonna do the investigation.” “You heard that,” Goldman asked. “Yes, sir.” “What was Sondland’s response?” “He said oh yeah, he’s gonna do it, he’ll do anything you ask.” Was the phone unsecured, Goldman asked. It was, said Holmes. Hill warns of Russian interests10:15 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: “I would ask that you please not promote politically driven falsehoods that so clearly advance Russian interests,” Hill said. “I say this not as an alarmist, but as a realist. … Right now, Russia’s security services and their proxies have geared up to repeat their interference in the 2020 election. We are running out of time to stop them. In the course of this investigation, I would ask that you please not promote politically driven falsehoods that so clearly advance Russian interests.” The aid and the phone call 10 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Holmes said he agrees with Taylor and Yovanovitch’s testimony. He goes on to talk about the hold on military aid. “My clear impression was that the hold was intended by the president either as an expression of dissatisfaction … or as an attempt to increase the pressure on them to do so.” The phone call he said he heard happened on July 26. He said about it: “During the lunch, Ambassador Sondland said that he was going to call President Trump to give him an update. Ambassador Sondland placed a call on his mobile phone, and I heard him announce himself several times, along the lines of: Gordon Sondland holding for the President. “It appeared that he was being transferred through several layers of switchboards and assistants. I then noticed Ambassador Sondland’s demeanor change, and understood that he had been connected to President Trump. “While Ambassador Sondland’s phone was not on speaker phone, I could hear the President’s voice through the ear piece of the phone. The President’s voice was very loud and recognizable, and Ambassador Sondland held the phone away from his ear for a period of time, presumably because of the loud volume. I heard Ambassador Sondland greet the President and explain that he was calling from Kyiv. I heard President Trump then clarify that Ambassador Sondland was in Ukraine. Ambassador Sondland replied yes, he was in Ukraine, and went on to state that President Zelensky, quote, unquote, loves your ass. I then heard President Trump ask, quote, “So he’s going to do the investigation?” unquote. Ambassador Sondland replied that, “He’s going to do it,” adding that President Zelensky will quote, “Do anything you ask him to.” Giuliani took ‘active role’ 9:50 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Holmes said of Sondland, “He made clear that he had direct and frequent access to president Trump and chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.” He went on to say that Giuliani took an active role when it came to Ukraine. “Over the following months, it became apparent that Mr. Giuliani had a direct influence on the policy that the three amigos (Sondland, Rick Perry, and Kirk Volker) were executing on the ground in Ukraine,” Holmes said. Holmes goes first 9:40 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Holmes gives his opening statement first and says he did not seek to testify but was subpoenaed. He said his goal is to testify truthfully. He talks about his work. 'My entire career has been in the service of my country,' he says. He was Marie Yovanovitch's top political adviser. He says a political agenda by Rudy Giuliani 'dramatically changed' the atmosphere at the U.S. embassy.  He talks about the effort to remove Yovanovitch from her post. He again blames Giuliani for promoting falsehoods about Yovanovitch. He also talks about Giuliani's comments about Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company, and the Bidens. More hearings? 9:30 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Nunes calls for a 'minority day of hearings.' The hearing has started 9:07 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Schiff is giving his opening statement. He immediately begins to talk about Gordon Sondland's testimony. “Trump put his personal and political interest above the United States,' Schiff said. Nunes claims it's the Democrats who got caught doing something wrong, not President Trump.  'They got caught trying to obtain nude photos of President Trump from Russian pranksters,' he said. Ready to go any moment 9 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: The committee members are getting into place and the hearing room is filling up. Just waiting for Hill and Holmes to take their seats. Starting soon 8:45 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: The hearing will begin in 15 minutes. Hill and Holmes have arrived on Capitol Hill. The rules 8:30 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: There will be opening statements from Hill, Holmes, committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-California, and Rep. Devin Nunes, R-California, who is the committee’s ranking member. Then, there will be 45 minutes for the committee’s counsel – Steve Castor for the Republicans and Daniel Goldman for the Democrats. Then, the members of the committee will have five minutes each to question Hill and Holmes. What will they be asked about 8:15 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Both Hill and Holmes have testified in closed-door sessions. Hill will likely be asked about a July 10 meeting where EU ambassador Gordon Sondland suggested that there should be investigations into Joe and Hunter Biden and the 2016 presidential election. Holmes says he overheard a cellphone conversation between Sondland and Trump on July 26. Let’s get started 8 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2019: Good morning and welcome to live updates from the fifth public hearing of the impeachment inquiry. The hearing begins in an hour, at 9 a.m. ET. Testifying today will be former National Security Council official Fiona Hill and David Holmes, a diplomat at the U.S. embassy in Kyiv.
  • A 63-year-old man accused of shooting and killing two teens on his West Dayton property was indicted Thursday on charges of murder and felonious assault, which comes after months of public outcry over a lack of an arrest and criminal prosecution in the killings. >> Read more trending news  Victor Santana, who owned the home at 848 Conner St., has been indicted by a Montgomery County grand jury for fatally shooting 17-year-old Dayton residents Devin Henderson and Javier Harrison. “The evidence in this case does not demonstrate a reasonable claim of self-defense,” Montgomery County Prosecutor Mat Heck Jr. said. Santana is in the Montgomery County Jail following his arrest on a warrant Thursday. Santana faces four counts of murder, five counts of felonious assault and one count of attempt to commit murder. Henderson, 17, of Dayton, died after being shot twice in the back in a garage at 848 Conners St., according to crime scene and autopsy photos and Montgomery County Coroner’s Office records. Harrison, also 17, was struck by gunfire in his back, arm and thigh, the records show. Prosecutors announced they will seek a high bond for Santana from the judge, because Santana has multiple residences in the U.S., including in New Mexico and California. In September, Montgomery County Prosecutor’s Office spokesman Greg Flannagan said Dayton Police Department investigators met with a panel of assistant prosecuting attorneys and reviewed the evidence in the case. “It was agreed by everyone that additional investigation needs to be completed before a formal filing of charges,” Flannagan said at the time. “The investigators will notify us when the investigation is complete in order to set a date to present the filing.” Linda Henderson, Devin Henderson’s mother, said it was heartbreaking to learn her son and his friend were shot in the back. “That’s bad news for any parent to hear,” she said. “To me, it seems like they were just trying to get away.” Dayton police Chief Richard Biehl on multiple occasions has said a new state law shifts the burden of proof in self-defense cases from the defendant to the prosecutors, which could affect this case. “The burden is on the state to prove this was not self-defense — it’s a high standard,” Biehl said. At about 9:30 p.m. Aug. 28, a resident of the home at 848 Conners St. says he heard noises and voices outside and saw a light from a car in his garage, police said. The man, who authorities have not identified, encountered three individuals and fired multiple shots from a .38-caliber pistol, police said. Henderson and Harrison were shot and killed, and the third individual, 19-year-old Jashin Gibson, fled but then returned when police and fire crews arrived on scene, police said. Gibson was arrested for breaking and entering. Gibson was booked in the Montgomery County Jail on a probation violation related to a robbery conviction, but was no longer there Thursday. Police said the detached garage was unsecured and open. The garage is about 15 feet from the home. Henderson was struck by two bullets in the back, according to coroner records and photos. One struck the left side of his upper back, and the other struck the right side, around the shoulder blade. Crime scene photographs show Henderson’s body wedged between the far wall of the garage and a silver Lincoln Continental. Harrison was struck by a bullet in the mid-section of the left back. It exited his chest and was recovered from his clothing, the initial autopsy report states. He also was hit in the thigh and the left forearm, with the bullet exiting through his elbow. Harrison’s body was found in the grass outside the garage, with his feet by the entryway, according to crime scene photos. The shooter called 911 to report the incident. He put the pistol down on his front porch before emergency responders arrived. Attorney Michael Wright, who is representing Harrison’s family, said it’s “somewhat obvious” that the shooting was not in self-defense. “We believe that they probably shouldn’t have been in the garage; however, they shouldn’t have been killed for being in the garage,” he said. In August, Biehl said it was tragic that two teens lost their lives, and police were consulting with prosecutors about the case. Biehl said it will be up to prosecutors to determine if it was a justifiable case of self-defense or a criminal act. Under a new state law, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person who uses deadly force did not do so in self-defense, defense of another or defense of the person’s residence. The burden used to be on the defendant to prove they acted in self-defense. Biehl said there was evidence of some drug activity taking place in the garage. Harrison’s father, Jimmy Harrison, previously said the boys sometimes went to the property to smoke marijuana. Henderson’s mother said the boys had gone to the property multiple times before. She said the shooter should have called the police when he heard noises outside or fire a warning shot. “I’m hearing this today that my son was shot twice in the back, and that little boy three times — that’s not right at all,” Linda Henderson said. “They didn’t have a chance.” She said she wants justice for her son, who was a twin, and for Harrison and his family.
  • A man recently found a six-foot tusk from a wooly mammoth while walking along an Alaskan beach. >> Read more trending news  Raymond Hunt, 27, saw only a few inches of what looked like a black pipe sticking out of the sand in Shaktoolik when he realized it was a tusk, likely from a woolly mammoth, KTUU reported. “It’s the first time I found one,” Hunt told KTUU. “I’ve got the tusk fever!” Hunt plans to sell the tusk, which is estimated to be worth about $5,000, to pay for winter fuel, food and snow-machine parts, KTUU reported.
  • A south Charlotte man claims he nearly ate a scorpion last week after bringing home blackberries he bought from a local grocery store. Tim Fox said he made the disturbing discovery last Tuesday evening, and he’s not happy with how the store where he said he purchased the fruit handled his complaint. He said it happened while eating his snack at work at a car dealership in Rock Hill. >> Read more trending news  'When I went to put one of the berries in my mouth, it was kind of hanging from it,” he said. Fox said he didn’t realize what it was at first and immediately threw it in the trash. “I went back, and I looked in the trash and I picked this scorpion up and it was dead,” he said. “I put it on my desk at work and I had about four coworkers around me, and we were like, ‘Oh my God.’” Fox, who lives in Ballantyne, said he buys berries from the Harris Teeter almost every week. He purchased the MegaBerryes brand blackberries two days before eating them. The day he opened the fruit and saw the scorpion, Fox said he called the Harris Teeter and asked a manager to remove the packages from the produce section before actually going to the store to speak with the manager face-to-face. “I showed him what I had, and he didn’t really act like he cared, and didn’t really say a whole lot about it,” Fox said. He said the manager showed him about 10 packages he removed from the shelf, but Fox thinks more should have been done. “They should have immediately taken every single blackberry in that store and went through every single package,” he said. Fox gave the manager his phone number and asked for a call from the grocery chain’s corporate office, but said he called the corporate office last Wednesday after he didn’t get a call back right away. He said the company offered him a $500 gift card, but he turned it down. Fox said he would like something more substantial. “I just think that they need to understand that they need to be more careful,” he said. WSOC contacted Harris Teeter and a communications manager responded to the request for comment in an email, writing: MegaBerryes, the Texas-based company listed on the package of blackberries, was also contacted but has not yet responded.