ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

cloudy-day
63°
Mostly Cloudy
H 64° L 47°
  • cloudy-day
    63°
    Current Conditions
    Mostly Cloudy. H 64° L 47°
  • cloudy-day
    64°
    Today
    Mostly Cloudy. H 64° L 47°
  • rain-day
    58°
    Tomorrow
    Rain. H 58° L 48°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Wsb news on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Wsb traffic on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Wsb weather on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

State & Regional Govt & Politics
Watch what’s next: Georgia might tax Netflix and downloads
Close

Watch what’s next: Georgia might tax Netflix and downloads

Watch what’s next: Georgia might tax Netflix and downloads
Photo Credit: Daniel Acker
The Netflix app is displayed for a photograph on an Apple iPad. Georgia legislators are considering whether to impose a 4 percent tax on streaming video, downloaded media and other communication services. Bloomberg photo by Daniel Acker

Watch what’s next: Georgia might tax Netflix and downloads

Possibly coming soon to a screen near you: a tax on Netflix and just about everything else you download or stream.

Georgia lawmakers, coaxed by dozens of lobbyists swarming the state Capitol, are pushing for a tax on digital video, books, music and video games.

That means you’d pay more for Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, Kindle e-books, iTunes music, Spotify and internet phone services.

Legislators and internet providers see it as a giant pool of untapped cash that could be used to subsidize construction of internet lines in economically depressed rural parts of the state.

Those who are already connected would pay the price: They’d bear the cost of the 4 percent tax, but its benefits would go toward rural residents who lack high-speed access to online products.

Georgia is the latest state to consider a far-reaching tax on internet services, a virtual gold mine for governments trying to raise money to prop up rural areas that have steadily lost businesses and residents to Atlanta and other cities. Only a handful of other states have imposed this kind of tax so far, but similar proposals have been introduced in legislatures across the country.

Both Gov. Brian Kemp and Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan have expressed reservations about the idea.

The proposal pits current customers against communication companies such as AT&T, who stand to profit because the digital tax would replace existing, higher taxes on cable TV, phones and broadband equipment.

A rural-urban divide

About 66 percent of Georgians oppose the idea of taxing internet, TV and phone services to raise money for rural internet, according to a statewide poll conducted last month for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

“We in the city have been taxed enough,” said Beverly Barnes, an Atlanta retiree who was questioned for the poll. “I look at my cable and cellphone bill, and I see we have enough fees. Most people move to the country because it’s cheaper out there. Let them pay for that.”

But state Rep. Jay Powell, the chairman of the powerful House Rules Committee, said customers have avoided paying sales taxes on digital products, creating inequities between old and new technologies. For example, a book purchased at a store is subject to sales taxes, but a downloaded e-book is tax-free.

He said those who have high-speed access should pay a tax to support Georgians who lack high-speed internet, which has become a necessity for business, education and health care.

“We are all part of the same state, and we help each other,” said Powell, a Republican from Camilla. “If Atlanta benefits, then the rest of Georgia benefits. If the rural section of Georgia benefits, then Atlanta benefits. We’re all in it together.”

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
The committee room is full as state Rep. Jay Powell presents a bill for a digital tax to the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Public Finance and Policy at the Georgia Capitol in February 2018. Georgia lawmakers are considering a tax on everything from Netflix to e-books, from internet phones to satellite TV service. Legislators say money raised for the tax would fund construction of rural internet lines. PHOTO / JASON GETZ
Close

Watch what’s next: Georgia might tax Netflix and downloads

Photo Credit: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
The committee room is full as state Rep. Jay Powell presents a bill for a digital tax to the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Public Finance and Policy at the Georgia Capitol in February 2018. Georgia lawmakers are considering a tax on everything from Netflix to e-books, from internet phones to satellite TV service. Legislators say money raised for the tax would fund construction of rural internet lines. PHOTO / JASON GETZ

Discomfort over new taxes

Nearly 60 lobbyists for cable, TV and cellphone companies are making an argument that it’s only fair that every service be taxed equally. Currently, various taxes and fees cover cable TV and phones but not satellite TV and internet video.

The resistance comes from legislators who oppose new taxes, consumers who would pay the tax and Dish TV, which doesn’t stand to benefit from government funding of rural internet since it already provides satellite-based online access to those areas. Before a similar digital tax proposal failed last year, Dish TV ran TV ads urging viewers to “Stop the Georgia TV tax!”

Legislation for the tax proposal hasn’t been introduced yet in Georgia, but a bill is coming from a group of influential rural House lawmakers who have made internet access a priority. They say the state government needs to spread around some of metro Atlanta’s economic prosperity. Other lawmakers are uncomfortable with the idea of a tax increase.

For a Netflix customer with a $12.99 monthly plan, a 4 percent tax would cost 52 cents per month, or $6.24 per year.

Rural Georgians such as Twalla Whitlock, who subscribes to satellite internet service, said they need faster, more affordable internet options.

“It’s expensive,” said Whitlock, a Brooks County resident who works in social services and responded to the AJC poll. “If they had more towers out here, it would be cheaper. In a lot of areas, they have limited service.”

The tax, combined with the repeal of existing taxes and fees, would generate $48 million in 2021 and reach $310 million by 2024, according to state estimates. Revenue would be split between state and local governments. The state portion would go into the general treasury, meaning there’s no guarantee it would go to help increase internet access in rural Georgia. The state can’t dedicate funding without changing the state Constitution.

Without state funding, internet companies say it doesn’t make financial sense for them to expand into less populated areas, where access is spread among fewer customers. State legislators want to subsidize internet companies’ costs to expand into regions that lack broadband service.

Less access, fewer opportunities

About 638,000 households — 16 percent of the state — lack access to internet with speeds of at least 25 megabits per second, according to a University of Georgia study.

Internet speeds in the 25 Mbps range are important to work from home, study online, download files and stream high-definition video, according to the Federal Communications Commission.

State Sen. Steve Gooch said he wants to find money for rural internet expansion, but he’s not convinced a digital services tax is the way to do it. He said funding could come from an existing fund for landline telephone expansion, and he opposes taxing satellite dishes because they don’t use public rights of way.

“We should exhaust all options and review our existing tax framework for internet, telephone, broadband and satellite services before making any decisions,” said Gooch, a Republican from Dahlonega.

State Rep. Viola Davis, a DeKalb County taxpayer advocate before she was elected last year, said she’s skeptical of the proposal.

“I get real uncomfortable when they want to tax an area and then redistribute that money to another area,” said Davis, a Democrat from Stone Mountain. “If you do the tax, the tax will be on primarily the urban homeowners and users of internet.”

Similar technologies should be taxed evenly, but it’s often unpopular when elected officials try to put a tax on services such as Netflix that have so far escaped the government’s reach, said John Buhl, a spokesman for the Tax Foundation, a Washington-based think tank. States including Hawaii, Pennsylvania and Washington tax streaming services.

“People think of Netflix, and they like Netflix, and they say, ‘Why are you trying to tax my Netflix?’ ” Buhl said. “Things that were goods in the past are now services in the digital era, and states need to deal with that. Otherwise, their tax base will get smaller quickly.”

Georgia already imposed sales taxes on products sold online, which went into effect Jan. 1. But electronic goods remain untaxed.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
State Rep. Jay Powell presents a bill for a digital tax to the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Public Finance and Policy at the Georgia Capitol in February 2018. Georgia lawmakers are considering a tax on everything from Netflix to e-books, from internet phones to satellite TV service. Legislators say money raised for the tax would fund construction of rural internet lines. PHOTO / JASON GETZ
Close

Watch what’s next: Georgia might tax Netflix and downloads

Photo Credit: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
State Rep. Jay Powell presents a bill for a digital tax to the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Public Finance and Policy at the Georgia Capitol in February 2018. Georgia lawmakers are considering a tax on everything from Netflix to e-books, from internet phones to satellite TV service. Legislators say money raised for the tax would fund construction of rural internet lines. PHOTO / JASON GETZ

Cable vs. satellite

Cable companies support broadening the tax base among all TV and internet customers — not just those that have cable and are already paying government franchise fees — Georgia Cable Association lobbyist Stephen Loftin said.

“Clearly, when you’ve got some services that pay a tax and others don’t, there’s an equity situation that needs to be addressed, particularly when the services are indistinguishable to the consumer,” Loftin said. “The only difference is the technology used to deliver it.”

The Georgia Cable Association’s members include Charter Communications, Comcast and Cox Communications, the cable and broadband internet subsidiary of Cox Enterprises, which also owns the AJC. Cox provides cable, internet and phone services in Middle Georgia, primarily in the Macon and Warner Robins area.

AT&T is the largest force of the telecommunications industry at the Georgia Capitol, with the biggest service area and the most lobbyists — 23 — according to state ethics commission records.

It wants any tax on internet services to also eliminate sales taxes on broadband equipment, saving money for telecom companies. A House council of rural legislators included the elimination of broadband equipment taxes in its recommendations.

“The state’s first step to spurring broadband deployment should be eliminating government-imposed economic and procedural hurdles that stifle private capital investment,” AT&T spokeswoman Ann Elsas said. “Once that has occurred, the state can assess the need for any additional steps like supplementing federal efforts to help enhance broadband deployment in hard-to-reach, high-cost areas.”

Netflix didn’t respond to requests for comment. Comcast referred questions to the Georgia Cable Association.

Dish, the satellite TV and internet provider, characterized the tax as a handout for “big cable.” Dish spokeswoman Karen Modlin said the company is the only statewide provider of video and broadband, without having to use local infrastructure.

“We hope that the Legislature will recognize that innovation can be achieved without saddling satellite customers with new and unwarranted taxes,” Modlin said.

Charlie Hayslett, the former owner of an Atlanta-based public relations firm who is writing a book about the divide between metro and rural parts of Georgia, said the tax plan for rural broadband could be an expensive waste of money.

While internet service is important for rural Georgia, he questions whether a government subsidy would solve the area’s connectivity problems.

“I’m all for helping rural Georgia,” Hayslett said, “but I’m also tired of being asked to sit in gridlocked traffic while the General Assembly uses my tax money to buy a pig in a poke for South Georgia.”

WHY IT MATTERS

More than 600,000 rural Georgia households lack access to high-speed internet, limiting opportunities for business growth, education and health care. State legislators are considering a tax on streaming video, music downloads and e-books to raise money to subsidize internet construction in unconnected parts of the state.

HOW IT WOULD WORK

A proposed 4 percent tax on all digital, phone and TV services would replace a variety of existing sales taxes and franchise fees currently charged on cable TV revenues and phone subscriptions. The communication services tax would cover streaming video and other internet downloads that currently aren’t taxable.

New taxes:

  • Streaming services such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and Hulu
  • E-books or audio books downloaded from Amazon and Audible
  • Music purchased from Spotify and iTunes
  • Video games
  • Digital photos, newspapers and magazines

Eliminated taxes:

  • Franchise fees of 5 percent on cable TV revenue
  • Franchise fees of 3 percent on landline phones
  • Sales taxes of at least 7 percent on landline phones, cellphones and broadband equipment

Source: Georgia House of Representatives Rural Development Council

Stay on top of what’s happening in Georgia government and politics at ajc.com/news/georgia-government/.

Read More

News

  • A passenger attempted to breach security at a TSA checkpoint at Orlando International Airport, an airport spokesperson said. >> Read more trending news  UPDATE 1:50 p.m. EST: Orlando police said a subject has been arrested after an attempted security breach at Orlando International Airport on Saturday.  The airport said security screening and shuttle services have resumed. UPDATE 1:40 p.m. EST: WFTV reporter Michael Lopardi sees long line for gates 1-59 stretches all the way down the corridor past the food court. Original report: A passenger attempted to breach security at a TSA checkpoint at Orlando International Airport, an airport spokesperson said. The incident caused a security scare at around noon Saturday, WFTV-TV reported. This attempted breach comes two weeks after a TSA worker died after jumping from a balcony inside the airport. Airport officials said the incident occurred at the checkpoint for gates 1-59. Law enforcement sources said the suspect was taken down with a stun gun. Officials said the screening process was paused and will resume. This is a breaking news story that will be updated as more information comes in.
  • A well-known Memphis rapper is facing drug, gun and theft charges in Shelby County, Tennessee. >> Read more trending news  Shelby County Sheriff's Office Deputies say James Baker, 22, better known as BlocBoy JB, is facing multiple charges. The rapper is wanted for possession of drugs and drug paraphernalia, a convicted felon in possession of a handgun\ and theft of property, according to SCSO. BlocBoy JB is widely known for his hit song with Drake 'Look Alive.' He's expected to perform in Memphis in May.
  • A Springfield man is behind bars after he allegedly tried to rob a Hardee’s on Valentine’s Day. >> Read more trending news  Court records say 35-year-old Eric Dean walked into the restaurant just after 8 p.m. with a green and black bandanna covering on his face and threatened an employee with a butcher knife. When the employee declined to give him any money, Dean said he had a gun and would shoot employees if they didn’t do what he wanted, court records state. A different employee chased Dean out of the restaurant, and he fled the scene on his bike. Jamie Skaggs, an employee at Hardee’s said she wasn’t working at the the time of the incident, but was concerned about her co-workers who were. She said the employee who was threatened with the knife was a little shaken up, but seemed to be doing alright. “I wanted to make sure they were OK,” she said. “I’m glad he didn’t get anything.” She said she was surprised when her manager confirmed the news she had seen on Facebook, but she wasn’t surprised when she learned who the suspect was. She said she’s familiar with the man. “I was friends with him for years a while back,” Skaggs said. Records say Springfield police officers caught up with Dean in the 2200 block of Clifton Avenue shortly after the incident. Court records say Dean eventually confessed to the crime. “He advised he has been going through some tough times right now financially and was only trying to get enough money to pay his electric bill. He also said that his current girlfriend was pressuring him to come up with money soon or she was going to leave him,” an affidavit says. Officers found the knife that Dean allegedly used in the robbery in a nearby driveway, with a black backpack that was used to conceal the knife. Dean was jailed and appeared in Clark County Municipal Court on charges of aggravated robbery and tampering with evidence. Dean told visiting judge Thomas Hanna that he lost his job within the last week. Not guilty pleas were entered for him and his bond was set at $75,000.
  • On the same day Colin Kaepernick and the NFL agreed to end Kaepernick's collusion grievance against the league, a Hall of Famer suggested the former 49ers quarterback could be Tom Brady's replacement when Brady's time comes to an end. >> Read more trending news  Former wide receiver Cris Carter brought up the topic on “First Things First” on Friday morning, saying the Patriots may not need to look at the quarterback class in the 2019 NFL Draft as they begin to think about a future without Brady under center. 'I wouldn't be surprised if the Patriots looked at (Kaepernick),' Carter said. 'The Krafts are very, very fond of Colin Kaepernick. If someone will do it, it will be the people in New England.' In the past, Patriots owner Robert Kraft has shown his support for Kaepernick, telling the New York Times that he would 'very much like to see him in the league.' Kaepernick threw 72 touchdowns and 30 interceptions in five seasons as a starter, and also ran for 2,300 yards and 13 touchdowns to go with one Super Bowl appearance to his name.
  • A massive drug operation with ties to a Mexican drug cartel resulted in the arrest of six immigrants in the country illegally. >> Read more trending news  Six men are behind bars, accused of running an elaborate drug trafficking operation in Mecklenburg and Iredell counties. The man the suspects are tied to is the main rival of El Chapo's drug cartel. The operation was working under the Jalisco New Generation Cartel. The human rights group Justice in Mexico reported last year that the Jalisco New Generation Cartel started gaining power after El Chapo's arrest. Federal officials said more than 1,800 grams of meth were delivered from a luxury home in Statesville in August and October of 2018. The person who lived there, Oscar Rangel-Gutierrez, is an alleged high-level cartel member. Rangel-Gutierrez’s parents lived in a large home in Troutman, according to the indictment. Agents said a credible informant told the Troutman Police Department in 2014 that large amounts of cocaine were being stored at the address. Court documents indicated that Rangel-Gutierrez and the five other suspects were in the country illegally. Agents said Rangel-Gutierrez transported 30 kilograms of cocaine and an unspecified large quantity of methamphetamine in a one-month period from Texas to Georgia and North Carolina. An apartment in Hidden Valley, a home in Derita and another home in east Charlotte are tied to the investigation, according to court documents. Misty Joyner lives near the home in east Charlotte where agents said Rangel-Gutierrez stored drug proceeds while he and another suspect went to a nightclub. She can't believe her neighbors are potentially involved “Just devastating,” Joyner said. “They were good people.” Four of the suspects were in federal court uptown Thursday. They waived their preliminary hearings. Two other suspects were arrested in Florence, South Carolina and Cleveland. El Chapo was convicted of drug crimes earlier this week and will spend the rest of his life in maximum security prison. His cartel was once the biggest supplier of drugs to the U.S. Arrested: Rodolfo Martinez Oscar Rangel-Gutierrez Raul Rangel- Gutierrez Regulo Rangel-Gutierrez Francisco Garcia-Martinez Rigoberto Rangel-Gutierrez
  • The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit on behalf of two women, both U.S. citizens, who say a border patrol agent unlawfully detained them outside a Montana convenience store because he heard them speaking Spanish. >> Read more trending news  Ana Suda and Martha Hernandez were at the convenience store when the border agent, identified as Paul O’Neal, approached them, according to the federal lawsuit filed Thursday. O’Neal allegedly commented on Hernandez’s accent and then asked the women where they were born. Hernandez was born in California and Suda was born in Texas, the ACLU said. The women showed O’Neal their valid Montana driver’s licenses. At that point, the lawsuit said O’Neal detained the women in the convenience store’s parking lot. The women then began taking video of O’Neal on their cellphones. 'Ma'am, the reason I asked you for your ID is because I came in here and I saw that you guys are speaking Spanish, which is very unheard of up here,' O'Neill said in the video. The two were detained for about 40 minutes, according to the lawsuit. The women’s ACLU lawyers said O’Neal should have let them go as soon as they identified themselves as U.S. citizens. In detaining them, the lawsuit argues that O’Neal violated the women’s Fourth Amendment rights barring unreasonable search and seizures. The lawsuit also argues the women were racially profiled, a violation of the Fifth Amendment right to due process. Customs and Border Protection spokesman Jason Givens declined to comment on the lawsuit, but said in an email to The New York Times, “lack of comment should not be construed as agreement or stipulation with any of the allegations.” In May, CBP spokesman Andrew Meehan told ABC News that speaking Spanish alone 'is not enough' to pull someone over or ask for ID. However, he said it's possible O'Neal 'very well could have been following procedure.' According to a statement from the ACLU, the experience was “humiliating and traumatizing” for the women. It said the women have been “shunned and harassed” by other town residents. “This unjustified and discriminatory seizure is part of a longstanding pattern of abuse by local CBP agents. It is illegal and must stop,” said Caitlin Borgmann, executive director of the ACLU of Montana. Suda and Hernandez are asking for an unspecified amount of money in compensation, punitive damages and a judge's order barring border officials from stopping or detaining anyone based on race, accent or language, according to the lawsuit.