ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

cloudy-day
83°
Mostly Clear
H 91° L 70°
  • cloudy-day
    83°
    Current Conditions
    Mostly Clear. H 91° L 70°
  • clear-day
    91°
    Today
    Mostly Clear. H 91° L 70°
  • clear-day
    91°
    Tomorrow
    Mostly Clear. H 91° L 70°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Wsb news on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Wsb traffic on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Wsb weather on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

State & Regional Govt & Politics
Georgia ‘heartbeat bill’ spurs strong debate about abortion
Close

Georgia ‘heartbeat bill’ spurs strong debate about abortion

Georgia ‘heartbeat bill’ spurs strong debate about abortion
Photo Credit: Alyssa Pointer
(ALYSSA POINTER/ALYSSA.POINTER@AJC.COM)

Georgia ‘heartbeat bill’ spurs strong debate about abortion

Liz Reed was 15 when she got pregnant in 2005.

At the urging of her family, Reed scheduled an abortion. But a trip to a North Georgia crisis pregnancy center — and hearing the heartbeat of the 7-week-old embryo in her womb — changed her mind. She knew she had to bring her baby into the world even if she didn’t have the means to support it.

That September, she gave birth to a baby girl who then went to a couple that had tried for years to have children.

Things were different for Jen, who asked that her last name be withheld. Jen, 43, said she knew as soon as she missed her first menstrual cycle last fall that she was pregnant. She would have to raise a baby alone, and that wasn’t something she was financially able to do.

She scheduled an appointment in November at the Planned Parenthood near her home in metro Atlanta and, when she was about eight weeks pregnant, took two pills that ended her pregnancy.

Under a proposal working its way through the Legislature, neither Jen nor Reed, who is now 29, would have had the option to have an abortion.

Georgia lawmakers are considering a bill that would ban most abortions as soon as a doctor can detect a heartbeat in the womb, which is usually about six weeks into a pregnancy. The measure, House Bill 481, has sparked a fierce and emotional debate over the point life begins and the role of government in health care.

Bob Andres/Bob Andres
March 14, 2019 - Atlanta - Pro bill speakers line up for public comments. The Senate took up a hearing Thursday for the "fetal heartbeat bill." Advocates on both sides were expected to fill the Capitol as the committee debates the bill that would outlaw most abortions after six weeks. Bob Andres / bandres@ajc.com
Close

abortion

Photo Credit: Bob Andres/Bob Andres
March 14, 2019 - Atlanta - Pro bill speakers line up for public comments. The Senate took up a hearing Thursday for the "fetal heartbeat bill." Advocates on both sides were expected to fill the Capitol as the committee debates the bill that would outlaw most abortions after six weeks. Bob Andres / bandres@ajc.com

The legislation comes at a time when several states are tackling the issue of abortion, from similar measures that would limit access in states such as Kentucky and Tennessee to bills guaranteeing access in Illinois and New York.

Many of the bills that have sought to limit access have run into legal trouble. Every “heartbeat bill” that has passed across the country so far has been overturned in a state or federal court, while in other states the bills were never signed into law.

And the Trump administration is being sued over its proposed changes to Title X funding that would bar taxpayer-funded family planning clinics from referring women to abortion providers.

The moves have mobilized forces on both sides of the issue.

Some Georgians have seen the availability of abortion whittled down in recent years, and with the makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court leaning more toward conservative ideals, they fear that even more restrictive laws could be upheld.

Others see an opportunity to end what they believe is a great moral wrong.

Hearings on HB 481 have attracted overflow crowds of passionate advocates from both sides. Some told deeply personal stories about their own decisions. Others debated the science.

So fraught has been the debate, that lawmakers had the committee room checked for bombs before Thursday’s Senate committee hearing.

>> Hearing on Georgia ‘heartbeat’ abortion bill draws emotional crowd

>> Photos: Georgia lawmakers debate ‘heartbeat’ abortion bill

>> Your copy of the Georgia Senate’s ‘heartbeat’ anti-abortion bill

>> In Georgia, abortion vote is a possible political turning point

>> See how Georgia state representatives voted on the ‘heartbeat bill’

Since Roe v. Wade

In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in its landmark Roe v. Wade decision that a woman had a right to an abortion up until the fetus had a viable chance at life outside the womb.

Since then, states have struggled to legislate when that viability — and life — begins.

The ruling established “viability” at the beginning of the third trimester, which is sometime between the 24th and 28th week of pregnancy, and Georgia followed the federal guidelines. Once in the third trimester, the court ruled that abortions could only be provided if the mother’s life or health was at risk.

In 2005 — the same year Republicans took complete control of state government — Georgia passed a law that requires abortion providers to tell pregnant women a range of information including any medical risks associated with abortion and carrying to term, as well as the gestational age of the fetus.

Women must also wait 24 hours before getting an abortion.

Georgia passed a law in 2012 banning abortions after 20 weeks that, after temporarily being blocked in court, went into effect in October 2015. The previous limit was 26 weeks. While the 20-week limit is in place, the case is still making its way through the legal system.

Abortions later than 20 weeks are only allowed when a fetus has congenital or chromosomal defects.

Two years later, the Legislature passed a law requiring parents to be informed at least 24 hours before their minor child receives an abortion, unless the girl petitions the court to waive the notification rule.

The Georgia Department of Public Health is tasked with overseeing the state’s abortions. Doctors who perform abortions after 20 weeks without an exemption are at risk of having their license suspended and facing one to 10 years in prison.

While there are no known cases of doctors being prosecuted for violating the law, doctors say it has had a chilling effect. A lawyer for the Georgia Composite Medical Board, which is tasked with tracking violations, said she could not say whether any have been reported.

Overturning Roe

Planned Parenthood Southeast President and CEO Staci Fox called the heartbeat bill a de facto ban on abortion, saying that most women are not even aware that they’re pregnant until about eight weeks.

“Banning abortion is just the latest fight over women’s autonomy,” she said. “It was (access to) birth control before that. It was the right to vote before that. It was owning property before that. We, as a society, still haven’t resolved the fact that women are humans.”

Bob Andres/bandres@ajc.com
March 14, 2019 - Atlanta - Georgia members of the Handmaid Coalition were protesting HB 481 outside the Capitol today. A Senate hearing was held Thursday for the "fetal heartbeat bill." Advocates on both sides are expected to fill the Capitol as the committee debates the bill that would outlaw most abortions after six weeks. Bob Andres / bandres@ajc.com
Close

abortion

Photo Credit: Bob Andres/bandres@ajc.com
March 14, 2019 - Atlanta - Georgia members of the Handmaid Coalition were protesting HB 481 outside the Capitol today. A Senate hearing was held Thursday for the "fetal heartbeat bill." Advocates on both sides are expected to fill the Capitol as the committee debates the bill that would outlaw most abortions after six weeks. Bob Andres / bandres@ajc.com

There are currently about 20 lawsuits surrounding abortion — including several heartbeat laws — up for consideration by the U.S. Supreme Court that could challenge the Roe v. Wade decision.

Georgia anti-abortion activists hope the state’s heartbeat bill will be the one that overturns the court’s ruling.

The bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Ed Setzler, said he has wanted to push legislation that puts additional limits on access to abortion since he was elected 14 years ago. If a heartbeat is what determines the end of life, he said it should also be considered when life begins.

“It’s so important we act on this,” the Acworth Republican said. “We have to protect children that have heartbeats. We know they’re part of the human community.”

Getting an abortion in Georgia

The state Department of Public Health reported more than 27,000 abortions were performed in 2017, the most recent year available.

The number of abortions has fluctuated in recent years but has generally trended down from about 32,000 in 2008.

In 2017, more than 129,000 babies were born in Georgia. That number also has decreased since 2008, when there were about 146,000 children born.

Georgia law requires that an abortion be performed by a licensed physician, meaning an obstetrician/gynecologist or family doctor who’s been trained can carry out the procedure.

There are at least nine abortion facilities in Georgia, with most in the Atlanta area. That lines up with where health care is available in the state — half of Georgia counties have no ob/gyn.

Abortions can be done surgically up to 20 weeks or “chemically” for women who are between five and 10 weeks pregnant by taking medication. At Planned Parenthood, women who are more than 10 weeks pregnant are referred to doctors who can perform an abortion.

Alyssa Pointer
03/06/2019 -- Atlanta, Georgia -- Jennifer [last name withheld], a volunteer at the Planned Parenthood East Atlanta health center, talks about her experience with using the service provided by the center, Wednesday, March 6, 2019. (ALYSSA POINTER/ALYSSA.POINTER@AJC.COM)
Close

abortion

Photo Credit: Alyssa Pointer
03/06/2019 -- Atlanta, Georgia -- Jennifer [last name withheld], a volunteer at the Planned Parenthood East Atlanta health center, talks about her experience with using the service provided by the center, Wednesday, March 6, 2019. (ALYSSA POINTER/ALYSSA.POINTER@AJC.COM)

The “morning after pill” does not cause an abortion, but instead prevents a woman who’s had unprotected sex from becoming pregnant. It must be taken within five days. It’s unclear how often the emergency contraception is used.

In some cases, private insurance will cover abortion. Public insurance plans, for the most part, don’t. It is explicitly prohibited in Georgia’s state employees insurance program, as well as Medicaid — the government health care program for the poor and disabled — and plans on the Affordable Care Act exchanges, except in cases of rape, incest or the life of the mother is at risk.

Jen paid about $500 for her abortion. Her insurance did not cover it.

She went to Planned Parenthood for her abortion because she knew she would not be judged. She has volunteered with the organization for years.

“It’s a very traumatizing experience no matter what,” she said. “If you add all the shame and the stigma, it’s really isolating. But I have no regrets. I know it was the right thing for me. I never wanted to raise a child alone after seeing what my mother went through with me.”

Jen was raised by a single mother who had her when she was 17 years old.

Jen recalls that a day or so before her appointment, she received a call from Planned Parenthood to go through the state-mandated counseling that described what the process would be like and let her know there were other options.

On the day of her appointment, Jen said she signed and initialed several forms, indicating multiple times that she was sure she wanted an abortion. She was then left by herself in a room to watch an informational video in which actors simulated what it was like to have an abortion and reminded her that there were other options available.

Jen then met with a doctor, who performed an ultrasound to determine how far along she was in her pregnancy and make sure there was only one embryo. She was asked whether she wanted to see the embryo or hear the heartbeat, but she said she declined.

Then she took a pill and was instructed to take a second pill between 24 and 48 hours later at home.

“It was really terrible,” she said. “It’s like having a miscarriage.”

Crisis pregnancy centers

In Georgia, the number of abortion clinics is far exceeded by organizations called “crisis pregnancy centers” that urge women to give birth. They offer assistance, including education about alternatives to abortion, to ease the burden of an unplanned pregnancy.

ERIC STIRGUS
The Pregnancy Resource Center of Gwinnett, located in Lawrenceville. ERIC STIRGUS / ESTIRGUS@AJC.COM
Close

pregnancy resource center

Photo Credit: ERIC STIRGUS
The Pregnancy Resource Center of Gwinnett, located in Lawrenceville. ERIC STIRGUS / ESTIRGUS@AJC.COM

For more than a decade, Daphne Harris Nicely has worked with such facilities.

Nicely served as executive director and CEO of the Atlanta Pregnancy Resource Center a faith-based practice with a mission of encouraging pregnant woman to give birth. The Atlanta Pregnancy Resource Center is now known as the Human Coalition Women’s Care Clinic.

There are 91 crisis pregnancy centers in Georgia, according to a University of Georgia-run website.

It was at one of those crisis centers that Reed at 15 decided against having an abortion.

“They asked if I was interested in having an ultrasound and I said yes,” said Reed, who lives in Sugar Hill. “As soon as they turned it on and found the heartbeat and I heard it, it hit me: That’s a heartbeat that is a separate person from me.”

She said she decided right then she was going to have her baby — and her mother put her out. Knowing she couldn’t raise a baby at 15 on her own, she found a family through an adoption agency to raise her daughter.

“I think about her every day,” she said.

Reed said she thinks having the ability to choose between abortion and adoption helped her to heal.

“I don’t think I would be as at peace with my decision as I am now,” she said. “I’m obviously very pro-life, but I don’t know that I support telling people what they can and can’t do. I think the way abortion is going to end is through education and love.”

Still, she said, if the heartbeat bill means there are fewer abortions in Georgia, she supports it.

Nicely is now the executive director of the Atlanta Morning Center, which provides free care from prenatal to postpartum to women who are uninsured or underinsured. She said her organization is “life affirming.” It also aims to improve women’s health.

The fact that Georgia has among the highest rates of maternal mortality was a big talking point of the 2018 election season, but Nicely said she hasn’t heard about anything being done to address the issue since then.

She said while she and her organization are “pro-life,” she wished the energy around the heartbeat bill was being spent on addressing maternal mortality.

‘Science has caught up’

Much of the debate over the bill has focused on the question of what a hearbeat signifies.

Setzler says science has allowed doctors to determine when a fetus has a heartbeat, “catching up” to the way abortion has been regulated. Previously, he said, doctors said during the early stages of pregnancy that an embryo is only a mass of tissue.

“This bill is medically sound, legally sound and, from the perspective of commonsense Georgians, is something we can coalesce around and support,” Setzler said.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Rep. Ed Setzler speaks in support of House Bill 481, the “heartbeat” bill, at the Georgia State Capitol on March 7, 2019. The Acworth Republican is the bill’s sponsor. EMILY HANEY / EMILY.HANEY@AJC.COM
Close

Why ‘heartbeat bill’ in Georgia has stirred up passions on both sides

Photo Credit: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Rep. Ed Setzler speaks in support of House Bill 481, the “heartbeat” bill, at the Georgia State Capitol on March 7, 2019. The Acworth Republican is the bill’s sponsor. EMILY HANEY / EMILY.HANEY@AJC.COM

But Dr. Melissa Kottke, an Atlanta-based ob/gyn who has practiced for 10 years, said Setzler’s bill is “built on a foundation of misleading statements and scientific inaccuracies.”

Doctors who oppose the legislation testified that what the bill’s supporters call a “heartbeat” detected at six weeks actually signals the practice motions of developing tissues that could not on their own power a fetus without the mother.

“It is extremely dangerous for lawmakers to presume they are better equipped than a woman and her health care provider to judge what is appropriate medical care,” she said. “This compromises both the integrity of the patient-physician relationship and the medical practice of evidence-based standards.”

Abortion rights activists have vowed to fight the proposal throughout the legislative process and, if it becomes law, in court.

After hours of emotional debate leading to the measure narrowly passing the House earlier this month, a Senate panel on Thursday heard several more hours of public testimony on HB 481.

The committee is expected to vote on the measure Monday.

The legislation has the support of Gov. Brian Kemp, who vowed during his campaign last year to sign the toughest abortion laws in the country.

To make it to Kemp’s desk this year, it must be approved by both chambers by the time lawmakers adjourn April 2.

Preparing for a fight

Those on both sides of the issue are preparing for a fight when the bill hits the Senate floor.

Anti-abortion lawmakers have called on their colleagues to vote with their conscience and acknowledge that if life begins at conception, terminating a pregnancy is immoral.

“As we look through things in the state of Georgia, let’s dig deep in our convictions and be less political,” said state Sen. Bruce Thompson, R-White. Thompson introduced similar legislation in the Senate, but it went nowhere.

Democrats and abortion rights activists say it’s unwise to vote against women in an era when female voters are showing up at the polls in droves.

“If you want to slam through this anti-abortion bill, just be prepared for the consequences,” Democratic state Sen. Nan Orrock of Atlanta warned her colleagues last week.

Fox, the Planned Parenthood Southeast CEO, said abortion rights activists already plan to target lawmakers who voted for the legislation. A Democrat announced his intent to run against Setzler the day after it cleared the House.

“We’re taking it one step at a time,” Fox said. “I’m focused on the fight of HB 481. But I’m already planning for next year and taking notes on who votes against women. We’re coming for those seats next year.”

Balanced coverage

Abortion is a divisive issue.We take great care with these types of stories and have tried to represent multiple points of view in our ongoing legislative coverage.

Read More

News

  • Officials with Eastern Virginia Medical School said Wednesday that a three-month investigation into how a racist photo appeared in Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam’s 1984 yearbook ended inconclusively. >> Read more trending news Officials launched an investigation into the photo, which showed a man posing in blackface next to a person in a Ku Klux Klan robe, after it surfaced Feb. 1. School administrators said they’d investigate the image’s origins and the broader campus culture in the 1980s as part of the probe. Update 10:55 am. EDT May 22: Attorney Ben Hatch, a partner at McGuireWoods, the law firm that conducted the independent probe, said investigators were unable to determine who was in the racist photo or how it got into the yearbook. “We could not conclusively determine the identity of either individual depicted in the that photograph,” Hatch said Wednesday at a news conference. “No individual that we interviewed has told us from personal knowledge that the governor is in that photo and no individual with knowledge has come forward to report to us that the governor is in that photograph.” Investigators interviewed 52 people over the course of their probe, including administrators, faculty, staff, current students and alumni at EVMS. On Wednesday, they shared details of the 36-page report developed from the probe. Hatch said investigators, hampered by the time since the yearbook was published, were unable to determine exactly how the photo got in the yearbook. He noted that several images were found in EVMS yearbooks between 1976 and 2013 -- when the school stopped publishing yearbooks -- that could be considered offensive to women, minorities and others. Original report: Officials including EVMS President Richard V. Homan and attorneys with the McGuireWoods law firm, which conducted the investigation, will hold a news conference at 10:30 a.m., according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch. >> Embattled Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam conducts business as usual, no plans to step aside Northam initially admitted to being one of the two people in the photo after it surfaced, but he later walked the statement back and said he was unaware of the photo before his staff showed it to him in February. He did, however, admit to wearing blackface to imitate Michael Jackson during a dance competition in the 1980s. “There were actions and behaviors in my past that were hurtful,” he said during a February news conference, according to WDBJ. “But like Virginia, I have also made significant progress in how I approach these issues.” >> Va. Gov. Ralph Northam says he plans to finish term with devotion to racial equity Eastern Virginia Medical School banned yearbooks in 2014, according to The Washington Post. The controversy surrounding Northam’s yearbook photo is one of several high-profile scandals that gripped the highest levels of Virginia state government earlier this year. Less than a week after the photo in Northam’s yearbook surfaced, state Attorney General Mark Herring admitted to wearing blackface to a party in the 1980s. Days after that, Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax was accused by two women of sexual assault, allegations he denied.
  • After 79 years of marriage, an Illinois couple are still living a sweet life. >> Read more trending news  Curtis Peters and Virginia Gregory were married in Knoxville, Iowa, on May 18, 1940, according to Iowa marriage records on Ancestry.com. Curtis Peters is now 100, and Virginia Peters is 103, and they celebrated their anniversary last week.  Their hearts have melted ever since their marriage, and they share a Hershey’s chocolate bar daily, according to WQAD. “Chocolate keeps him going, and he keeps her going, they love each other very much,” the couple’s daughter, Susan Peters Cathoir, told the television station. The couple moved from Iowa to a nursing home in Illinois to be closer to Cathoir, the fourth of the Peters’ five children. Cathoir told “Today” there was always chocolate around the home when she was growing up. Cathoir said her parents even melted Hershey’s bars so the family could dip their ice cream into the chocolate. The couple even took the family on a bus trip from Iowa to Pennsylvania in the late 1950s to visit Hershey Park (now Hersheypark) to see how their favorite sweet was made, according to “Today.” The couple met while living in Cedar Falls, Iowa, where they attended the Iowa State Teachers College (now the University of Northern Iowa). After their marriage, Curtis Peters was a self-employed painter in Waterloo, while Virginia Peters was a teacher, WQAD reported. “It’s a long, long time, but they are good times,” Virginia Peters told the television station. The Peters’ children bring chocolate whenever they visit. 'I keep a pack in the freezer and go and give them one every day.” Cathoir told “Today.” I always leave chocolate in their drawer so in case I can't make it or I'm late, one of the (nurses) can make sure they still get it.” Cathoir said the Hershey’s bar keeps her father alive, “and he keeps her alive.” 'He shares it with her all the time — he shares everything with her and she with him,” Cathoir told “Today.” “Yes, and they are still madly in love, isn’t that great?” their nurse, Julie Derick, told WQAD. “They hold hands all the time.” The couple celebrated their 79th anniversary last weekend with family and friends, the television station reported. Chocolate was definitely on the menu.
  • A Tennessee man is accused of threatening police officers and rolling up a marijuana blunt in front of them. >> Read more trending news  Lemink Mitchell was arrested Tuesday in Memphis, WHBQ-TV reported. Memphis police said they were called to the home because Mitchell was threatening to kill his mom after she kicked him out. She wanted officers to get him out of the home, police said. When officers arrived, they said he threatened to kill them, too. Police said while they were talking to him, he started to cuss at them. “He don’t give a (expletive) that officers are right here. He is going to do what he want to do,” he told the police. He then rolled up some marijuana into a blunt before trying to escape, police said. Court records said multiple people came out of their houses while he was running away. After a short chase, Mitchell was arrested. Mitchell is facing multiple charges, including disorderly conduct and evading arrest.
  • A Virginia woman who recently died had some extreme, and illegal, final wishes. She wanted her dog Emma euthanized so the dog and the woman could be together forever. Workers at Chesterfield Animal Shelter were caring for Emma for two weeks as they tried to dissuade the executor of the woman’s estate from going through with the woman’s plans. The workers tried to get the person to sign over the ownership of the dog to the shelter so workers could find the shih tzu mix a new home, WWBT reported.  The person held firm and picked up the dog and then took it to a vet’s office, had it put down and then taken to a pet cremation business. The remains were put in an urn and returned to a representative of the woman’s estate. >> Read more trending news  WWBT did not say how the remains were handled after the pet’s cremation. But there was an issue. While it is technically legal to put down a healthy pet in Virginia, there is an ethical question surrounding it, so it could be difficult to find a veterinarian to put down an animal, according to WWBT.  But it is illegal in the commonwealth to bury an animal’s remains, whether it is a dog or any other animal, in a casket in a cemetery. But the law applies only to a commercial cemetery. Private and family-owned cemeteries can be an exception to the law, WWBT reported. 
  • Georgia Tech announced Wednesday it is offering credit monitoring and identity theft protection to the students, employees and anyone else whose information may have been accessed during a recent data breach. The school posted information on its homepage of its website detailing how people can request the protections. Georgia Tech disclosed in April that someone illegally entered its system, having access to a database that may have included the names, addresses, date of birth and Social Security numbers of nearly 1.3 million people. Georgia Tech has not determined who was committed the breach. “We regret that this incident occurred and apologized for any inconvenience,” Jim Fortner, Georgia Tech’s interim executive vice president for administration and finance, said in a statement. The breach is reminiscent, but far larger, than one last July when students were furious after the university mistakenly emailed the personal information of nearly 8,000 College of Computing students to other students.
  • A class-action lawsuit accuses a South Carolina public water company of overcharging its customers, claiming a customer service representative in one case blamed a cat flushing a toilet for an excessive bill, The State reported. >> Read more trending news  The suit, filed May 15 in the Court of Common Pleas, Ninth Judicial District in Charleston County, also claims the Mount Pleasant Waterworks blamed customers’ leaky pipes and irrigation systems for the increase in bills. The four plaintiffs in the case, who are from Mount Pleasant, claimed their water bills could jump by hundreds of dollars without warning, according to the lawsuit. They are seeking refunds of all excess charges. The plaintiffs are also asking to have the case classified as a class action suit for all Mount Pleasant water customers, the State reported. “In one particularly egregious instance, it is reported that MPW’s customer service representative told a customer that the customer’s cat was flushing the toilet and that the cat was causing the customer’s excessive water bills,” the lawsuit claims. The suit references four cases in which the utility blamed leaks that did not exist, charged excessive late fees and promised refunds that were never applied to the customers’ accounts, the State reported. Trisha Treece, one of the plaintiffs, said she was out of town in 2019 during the January and February billing cycles and had turned off her toilet and irrigation systems, according to the lawsuit. Her bills for those two months were $305.18 and $315.87, the suit claims. After the water company refused to send a technician to inspect the meter, Treece said she hired a Rainbird technician who determined there were no leaks and that the irrigation system was working properly, the lawsuit claims. Officials from the Mount Pleasant Waterworks said Monday the lawsuit’s claims were “baseless,” the State reported. “Lawsuits of this nature impact rate-payers more than one would think,” utility officials said in a statement. “Because a few customers have filed a lawsuit, with no basis, other customers will pay more in their water bills to cover legal and administrative costs. Staff directs countless hours and resources away from our primary mission of providing our customers with essential water and wastewater service.”