On Air Now

Listen Now

Weather

cloudy-day
72°
Partly Cloudy
H 92° L 71°
  • cloudy-day
    72°
    Current Conditions
    Partly Cloudy. H 92° L 71°
  • cloudy-day
    92°
    Today
    Partly Cloudy. H 92° L 71°
  • partly-cloudy-tstorms-day
    90°
    Tomorrow
    Chance of T-storms. H 90° L 72°
Listen
Pause
Error

News on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

Listen
Pause
Error

Traffic on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

Listen
Pause
Error

Weather on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

National
Impeachment hearings: Gordon Sondland testimony, livestream, live updates
Close

Impeachment hearings: Gordon Sondland testimony, livestream, live updates

Gordon Sondland testifies in public impeachment inquiry

Impeachment hearings: Gordon Sondland testimony, livestream, live updates

Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, testified Wednesday morning before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence about his part in the alleged plan to get Ukraine officials to promise to open an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son in exchange for the release of millions of dollars of military aid.

>> Read more trending news 

Sondland was expected to explain why he testified in a closed-door House hearing that he had not told Ukrainian officials that the military aid was dependent on investigations into the Bidens and election interference in the 2016 presidential election. Sondland revised that testimony earlier this month saying he remembered telling a Ukrainian official that the military aid was "likely" dependent on the country announcing the investigations.

David Hale, the undersecretary of State for political affairs and Laura Cooper, a deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Russian, Ukrainian and Eurasian affairs, were scheduled to testify later Wednesday.

Livestream

Live updates

Switching live coverage

7 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Editor’s Note: Live coverage has pivoted to the Democratic debate for the night. For the remainder of tonight's impeachment inquiry hearing, click here.  

The president put the hold on aid

6:35 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: An Office of Management and Budget official told Hale that Trump had directed, though the acting chief of staff, to put a hold on the military aid.

Do holds on aid happen?

6:29 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Is a hold on foreign aid normal? Not necessarily, Hale says, but “It is certainly an occurrence. It does occur,” he said. Is it unusual to place a hold on military aid to leverage another country to investigate a political opponent?

“It’s certainly not what I would do,” Hale said.

Two surprise emails

6:20 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Cooper in her opening statement says she’s learned of the existence of two emails sent on July 25, two hours apart. One showed the Ukrainian embassy “asking about the security assistance,” and the second one showed that the “Hill knows about the [aid freeze] situation.” Schiff says the emails indicate that the Ukrainians knew about the aid freeze possibly before the July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky.

A change of procedure

6:10 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Schiff announces that the first round of counsel questioning will be skipped tonight, and the committee will go straight to five-minute member questioning.

Nunes complained that this is a surprise to the Republicans who said they did not get adequate notice. Schiff said they were notified last night. Nunes complained because Hale is a witness they requested to be called.

Opening statements

5:55 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Hale is the first witness who does not have a prepared opening statement. Cooper is giving her statement now.

The second hearing of the day is beginning

5:40 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: The hearing with David Hale, the undersecretary of State for political affairs and Laura Cooper, a deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Russian, Ukrainian and Eurasian affairs, is beginning. Schiff and Nunes are giving their opening statements. Nunes is listing people who have not been called to testify. The whistleblower is the first he mentions. Hunter Biden is the second.

The hearing is ending

3:30 p.m ET Nov. 20, 2019: Nunes is giving his closing statement, basically refuting the Democrats talking points. Schiff says the evidence is significant but troubling. Schiff is now reading parts of Sondland's opening statement.

The committee will take a break and then begin the second hearing.

 

‘What it took to get it out of you’

3:08 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Maloney and Sondland have a pointed exchange.

Maloney: Who would benefit from an investigation of the Bidens?

Sondland: I assume President Trump.

Maloney: There it is!

Sondland: "I really resent what you’re trying to do."

Maloney: "All due respect sir, we respect your candor, but let’s be really clear what it took to get it out of you.”

Mulvaney clip

2:55 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Joaquin Castro plays a clip from a press conference by White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney in which he said military aid to Ukraine was on hold to get “investigations.” Castro asks if it’s appropriate for the president to ask a foreign country to investigate a political opponent.

“The president should not investigate a political rival in return for a quid pro quo,” Sondland said

Rep. Eric Swalwell asks Sondland if he knows Trump well. 

2:35 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Sondland says, “It really depends on what you mean by know well. We are not close friends. We have a professional, cordial working relationship.” He asks him if he gave him $1 million for his inauguration. “I bought a VVIP ticket to the inauguration,” Sondland said. “That’s a lot of money, right?” Swalwell asks. “That’s a lot of money,” Sondland says.

Counting Pinocchios

2:20 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Rep. Jackie Speier, D-California, and Rep. Mike Conaway, R-Texas, argue about a story in the Washington Post about Schiff’s contention that the whistleblower is entitled to anonymity. The Post gave Schiff three “Pinocchios” for misleading facts, Conaway points out. Speier says, “The president of the United States has five Pinnochios on a daily basis so let’s not go there.” The public audience claps.

 

Giuliani goes after Volker, Castor

2 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: In two tweets, Giuliani states his opinion on the testimony.

   

Quid pro quo and who said what

1:50 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, asks Sondland about his conversations with Trump about Ukraine. He says what he talked about was the only first-hand evidence that matters. He points out that there were only three or four conversations and in the main one, he said he wanted no quid pro quo.

Rep. Jim Himes, D-Connecticut, asks Sondland what Giuliani told him to establish that Giuliani was speaking for Trump. Sondland says it wasn’t Giuliani but Volker who told him that Giuliani spoke for Trump.

Hearing resumes

1:40 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: The hearing has resumed.

Lunch break

1:12 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: They have recessed for lunch.

Giuliani responds

Not interested in the Bidens

12:40 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: As Castor continues to challenge Sondland on his recollections, Sondland said he “wasn’t into investigating the Bidens.”

He said “It was very surprising to me” when he realized that Trump wanted that.

 

Is he now aware of the investigations

12:17 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: During the second extended questioning period, Democratic counsel Goldman asks if Sondland is now aware that Trump wanted the Biden investigation and a 2016 election investigation. Sondland says, “That’s correct.”

Sondland says several times that he never heard the president say that the military aid was tied to an announcement of investigations.

Goldman also asks Sondland about text messages and emails that Pompeo was in on the plan to demand a quid pro quo from the Ukrainians. Sondland says he did send the text messages and emails and that Pompeo was informed about the quid pro quo.

FBI wants to interview the whistleblower

11:50 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019Yahoo News is reporting that the FBI has asked to interview the whistleblower who filed the complaint about the President’s July 25 call. 

No ‘irregular' channel’

11:45 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Sondland rejects the idea of an “irregular channel” of US-Ukraine policy.

“I don’t see how, when you’re talking to the president of the United States, the secretary of state, the national security adviser, the chief of staff in the White House, the secretary of energy – if a bunch of folks who are not in that channel are aggrieved for not being included, I don’t know why they consider us to be the irregular channel and they the regular channel, when it’s the leadership that makes the decisions.”

Castor then suggests that Sondland’s memory isn’t the greatest since he didn’t take notes, calling his responses a “trifecta” of unreliability. Sondland said he could better answer questions if he had his notes.

Trump responds

 

Pence denies Sondland's claims

11:35 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Vice President Mike Pence’s office says Sondland never talked to the vice president in Warsaw as he testified to today. From Pence chief of staff Marc Short, per Maggie Haberman of the New York Times: 

"Marc Short responds to Sondland: “The Vice President never had a conversation with Gordon Sondland about investigating the Bidens, Burisma, or the conditional release of financial aid to Ukraine based upon potential investigations...” 1/

“Ambassador Gordon Sondland was never alone with Vice President Pence on the September 1 trip to Poland. This alleged discussion recalled by Ambassador Sondland never happened...” 2/

“Multiple witnesses have testified under oath that Vice President Pence never raised Hunter Biden, former Vice President Joe Biden, Crowdstrike, Burisma, or investigations in any conversation with Ukrainians or President Zelensky before, during, or after the September 1 meeting”

Nunes begins questioning

11:30 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Nunes asks Sondland if he knew about Alexandra Chalupa and her work to get opposition information on Donald Trump. No, Sondland says. Nunes also asks about Ukrainian officials slamming Trump during the 2016 election. He says it should make it easier to understand why Trump was wary of the Ukrainians. We want to know who the Democratic operatives who “dirtied up” the Trump campaign are, Nunes says. “They (the Democrats) can’t get over” that he (Trump) would send his personal attorney over there (Ukraine) to find out about it.”

What did Pence say

11:06 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Sondland said Pence expressed no surprise at the statement nor ignorance of the situation. Goldman asks him about Pence, “He didn’t say, Gordon what are you talking about?”

“No,” Sondland said.

Goldman: “He didn’t say, Gordon, what investigations?”

“He did not,” Sondland said.

 

A short recess

11:04 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: The hearing has recessed for a short break.

Trump didn’t tell him anything about military aid

10:59 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Sondland continually says that Trump never spoke to him about the holdup of military aid. “Trump never told me directly that the aid was conditioned on an announcement of investigations.” He said that eventually he "presumed" the aid and investigations were linked.

The phone call in Ukraine; ‘he loves you’re a—'

10:40 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Sondland tells Democratic counsel Daniel Goldman that he probably said Trump “doesn’t give a s--t about Ukraine” but denies that he said Trump only cares about the “big stuff.”

‘I don’t think I would have said that. I would have honestly said that he’s not a big fan of Ukraine, and he wants the investigations that we have been talking about for quite some time to move forward.

Sondland also said he likely told Trump on phone call at a Kyiv restaurant that Zelensky “loves your a--, he’ll do whatever you want.”

As the audience laughs, Sondland says, “That sounds like something I would say. That’s how Trump and I communicate. A lot of four-letter words. In this case three letters.”

He said he spoke with Pence

10:30 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: From his opening statement, Sondland says he spoke with Vice President Mike Pence about the quid pro quo. According to Sondland, "I mentioned to Vice President Pence before the meetings with the Ukrainians that I had concerns that the delay in aid had become tied to the issue of investigations."

‘Biden didn’t come up’

10:25 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Sondland says he didn’t know that the Biden’s were linked at all with Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company. “Biden did not come up,” Sondland said of his first hearing of the desire for an investigation. “Today I know exactly what it means. I didn’t know at the time.”

Schiff asks Sondland to describe the “continuum of insidiousness.”

An email about the investigation

10:06 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Sondland is reading an email that the State Department that the department has been refusing to turn over to the committee.

Sondland read:

Within my State Department emails, there is a July 19 email that I sent to Secretary Pompeo, Secretary Perry, Brian McCormack (Perry’s Chief of Staff), Ms. Kenna, Acting Chief of Staff and OMB Director Mick Mulvaney (White House), and Mr. Mulvaney’s Senior Advisor Robert Blair. A lot of senior officials.

Here is my exact quote from that email: “I Talked to Zelensky just now… He is prepared to receive Potus’ call. Will assure him that he intends to run a fully transparent investigation and will ‘turn over every stone’. He would greatly appreciate a call prior to Sunday so that he can put out some media about a ‘friendly and productive call’ (no details) prior to Ukraine election on Sunday.” Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney responded: “I asked NSC to set it up for tomorrow.”

Everyone was in the loop. It was no secret. Everyone was informed via email on July 19, days before the Presidential call. As I communicated to the team, I told President Zelensky in advance that assurances to “run a fully transparent investigation” and “turn over every stone” were necessary in his call with President Trump.

Explosive opening statement

Explosive opening statement

9:45 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Sondland begins the hearing with a stunning opening statement. He says that Trump, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and former national security adviser John Bolton all were aware of a "quid pro quo," dangling a White House visit for the new president of Ukraine to investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter and the 2016 presidential election.

"They knew what we were doing and why," Sondland said in the opening statement. "Everyone was in the loop. It was no secret."

He mentioned Pompeo often, saying Pompeo was kept informed as to what was going on.

"State Department was fully supportive of our engagement in Ukraine affairs, and was aware that a commitment to investigations was among the issues we were pursuing," Sondland said.

He said he, Kurt Volker, and Energy Sec. Rick Perry did not want to work with Rudy Giuliani, the president’s personal attorney, but they were told to do so. He said he felt Giuliani was speaking for Trump.

"Mr. Giuliani was expressing the desires of the president of the United States, and we knew that these investigations were important to the president," Sondland will tell the House Intelligence Committee.

Sondland says he knows that the question "was there a quid pro quo" was being asked by House members. He said that when it comes to the White House meeting sought by Ukraine's leader, "The answer is yes."

Nunes’ opening statement

9:30 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Nunes slams Democrats for “hijacking the Intelligence Committee and turning it into the impeachment committee.” The Democrats have gathered zero Republican support in the House, Nunes says. He reminds the audience that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, said that impeachment had to be a bi-partisan effort. “Did they forget that?", Nunes asked. He tells Schiff that the Republicans have sent a letter to the committee to assert their right to subpoena witnesses and will do so, including Hunter Biden.

Schiff’s timeline

9:27 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Schiff presents a timeline of meetings and phone calls involving Sondland, former national security adviser John Bolton and others he says laid the foundation for a quid pro quo that would end up with the Ukrainian president visiting the White House for a meeting with Trump after the announcement of an investigation into the energy company Burisma.

The hearing is beginning

9:10 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Sondland is seated and Rep. Adam Schiff, D-California, has gaveled the hearing to order. Schiff is giving his opening statement.

The hearing will begin soon

9 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: The hearing will begin in minutes. Sondland is on Capitol Hill and will be entering the hearing room soon.

Not a career diplomat

8:45 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Sondland has not been a diplomat for long. Trump named him EU ambassador after Sondland donated $1 million to Trump’s inaugural committee. Sondland was a hotel entrepreneur.

What will Sondland be saying

8:30 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Sondland will be answering questions today about his dealings with Ukrainian officials and why he changed testimony he gave in a closed-door hearing in October. He told members of the Intelligence Committee that he had not told Ukrainian officials that they had to announce the start of an investigation into Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company, in exchange for military aid. He later said he may have said investigations should be announced before the military aid was released.

Who is testifying this week

8:17 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Eight people will be testifying this week in the House impeachment inquiry. On Tuesday, Alexander Vindman, Jennifer Williams, Kurt Volker and Tim Morrison testified. Today, Sondland, Cooper and Hale appear before the committee. On Thursday, Fiona Hill, who was the top Russia specialist on the National Security Council and David Holmes, a State Department aide who overheard a phone conversation between Sondland and the president on July 26, will testify.

Let’s get started

8 a.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019: Good morning and welcome to live updates from the fourth public hearing of the impeachment inquiry. The hearing begins in an hour, at 9 a.m. ET. Testifying first today will be Gordon Sondland, the European Union ambassador. This afternoon, Laura Cooper, a deputy assistant secretary at the Defense Department, will appear before the committee, as will David Hale, the undersecretary of State for political affairs.

Read More

News

  • A North Alabama police officer said he was placed on administrative leave following complaints about two social media posts, including one that mocks the late George Floyd. Ross Greenwood, an officer with the Mentone Police Department, said he was put on leave pending the outcome of a termination hearing, AL.com reported. Greenwood said he was not told who complained about his posts, but Mentone Mayor Rob Hammond confirmed the administrative leave to the Fort Payne Times-Journal. Greenwood said he shared two posts that received complaints. One, posted June 14, noted that the “Treasury Department will honor George Floyd by placing his portrait on the $20 counterfeit bill.” The second post, made on June 19 read, “Breaking News: Quaker Oats officially changes name to Shaquille O’atmeal.” Floyd is the Minneapolis man who died May 25 after a police officer put his knee into the man’s neck for nearly nine minutes. Greenwood said he left the posts on his Facebook page because he wanted to be transparent, the Times-Journal reported. He said he does not believe he did anything wrong, and said he “absolutely” enforces the law equally. Hammond said Mentone Police Chief Gene McKee met with town attorney Pat Tate to discuss his investigation, the Times-Journal reported. “It is the Town’s contention that these postings are a violation of the Mentone Police Department’s code of conduct,” Hammond told the newspaper, adding a termination hearing would be held “within the next 10 days.” Greenwood, who has been with the Mentone Police Department, previously was the chief of police in nearby Sylvania. “In my opinion, (Floyd) was a criminal. He’s sure made a name for himself,” Greenwood told the Times-Journal, adding he was unhappy with the news of several products changing their branding because they play off racial stereotypes. “A lot of this has gotten way out of hand,” Greenwood told the newspaper. “What’s the standard of what we can share on social media? I’ve never targeted or threatened to kill anyone.” “If some radical Christian shot up a church, I’d share a story about that as much as I would if a radical Muslim did,” Greenwood told the Times-Journal. “I’m prejudiced against people who do stupid things. I can’t help what race you are when you mess up. I do post a lot of stuff about minorities and may post some stuff that looks racist, but there’s got to be some standard. Innocent people are getting killed.” Greenwood said he had asked for a copy of the police department’s social media policy but never received it, AL.com reported. He also said he never signed any papers documenting that he agreed to any department social media policy. “There’s something on Facebook that’s going to offend somebody,” Greenwood told AL.com. “There’s posts going around of police officers getting their throats cut. That offends me. But I don’t get out of shape. I just think, ‘Wow, that’s pretty rough.’”
  • A Black family has sued Hilton and a North Carolina Hampton Inn franchisee, alleging discrimination after a white clerk called police regarding a billing dispute. Dolores and Alvin Corbett, along with their two teenagers, checked in to The Hampton Inn & Suites on Nov. 23, 2018, in Wilson, North Carolina, along with some extended family. According to a news release provided by attorney Jason Kafoury, the family was there to “celebrate the life” of Alvin Corbett’s mother, Fannie Corbett, who died in 2019 and was declared a “civil rights pioneer” in North Carolina, The News & Observer reported. The following morning, the suit alleges, the unidentified clerk loudly and repeatedly told Dolores Corbett that her credit card had been declined. Corbett tried to explain that she had prepaid for the $145-per-night room using her Hilton Honors account points, but when she asked to speak to a supervisor, the clerk shouted, “Get off my property” and alerted police. Dolores Corbett told USA Today the humiliation and degradation suffered warranted the lawsuit, but the clerk’s summoning of police “put our family in imminent danger.” The family checked out immediately and told officers they had done nothing wrong when they arrived. And even though the clerk conceded to the responding officers that the billing question had been resolved, the suit alleges the officers escorted the Corbett family from the premises and circles their car in a restaurant parking lot while they waited for their extended family to join them, USA Today reported. Meanwhile, the Corbetts’ attorneys shared with the publication an email from the hotel’s general manager, Phil Ronaghan, dated one day after the 2018 incident, offering his “sincerest apologies” and calling the clerk’s actions “unprofessional and unwarranted.” Ronaghan also said in the email the unnamed clerk told them she called police because she felt threatened, but he did not feel the situation rose to “anywhere near that level of dispute” and noted that she had been reassigned pending an internal review of the incident, USA Today reported. In response, Hilton spokesman Nigel Glennie told the newspaper, “Hilton’s records show that our guest assistance team worked to resolve this complaint in 2018. We believe that our Hilton team engaged with sensitivity to understand, listen and address concerns about the guest’s experience.” According to The News & Observer, the suit seeks damages to compensate for the plaintiffs’ “economic loss, humiliation, embarrassment and emotional distress” as well as punitive damages that would punish the defendants’ alleged “willful, wanton, and reckless conduct” to prevent similar incidents in the future.
  • Deputies in an Oregon county were in the right place at the right time this week, saving two lives in the same spot on two different days. Shortly after 11 p.m. on Monday, Washington County deputies received a call that a 16-year-old girl was at the top of a parking structure across the street from the Sheriff’s Office in HIllsboro, KATU-TV reported. Deputies were able to coax the girl, who was allegedly preparing to jump, away from the outside railing, the television station reported. “There’s a lot of grief associated with the loss of normalcy with what youth are doing right now and the connections to their peers,” Emily Moser, director of the non-profit YouthLine, told KGW. Moser’s job has taught her a lot about how teens are trying to make sense of a world that doesn’t make much sense right now. “The uncertainty that they’re feeling is very much in the here and now,” she said. On Tuesday, deputies responded to the same area, as a woman in her 30s was standing on the top of the parking structure, KGW reported. “I received a phone call from a coworker who was driving home and she told me there was a subject on the top level of a local structure that was outside the barrier,” Commander Caprice Massey told the television station. When Massey arrived, she tried to engage with the woman by talking to her. “She starting signing in American Sign Language and she preferred to communicate that way, and as luck has it, I know sign language,” Massey told KGW. Massey was able to talk the woman back over the barrier without saying a word. “I asked the young lady if she would sit with me and we sat pretty close to each other,” Massey told KGW. “Just take the time to check in with people and when you ask ‘How are you?’ wait for the answer.”
  • Two Oklahoma police officers have been charged with second-degree murder nearly one year after the death of a naked Wilson man last Fourth of July weekend. According to the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, Jared Lakey, 28, died July 6, 2019, after officers Joshua Taylor and Brandon Dingman discharged their stun guns on him more than 50 times, WXII reported. The incident occurred just before midnight on the Fourth of July after Taylor, 25, and Dingman, 34, responded to a call of a naked man running down a Wilson street screaming. “The two Wilson police officers were trying to take Lakey into custody, and he was not cooperating. He was not complying with their requests,” OSBI public information officer Brook Arbeitman said, according to the arrest affidavit. According to court documents, an OSBI agent reviewed dash and body camera footage of the arrest, The Ardmoreite reported. “The footage reveals numerous instances of both officers using their X26P tasers to send electrical shocks through (the victim’s) body in an apparent attempt to persuade him to put his hands behind his back as he lay on the ground,” the agent stated in an affidavit. Court documents indicate Dingman discharged his stun gun 23 times for a total of 114 seconds over the course of nine minutes, while Taylor deployed his stun gun 30 times for a total of 122 seconds. Despite sustaining nearly four minutes of electrical jolts, court documents state Lakey never struck, grabbed or made any aggressive attempts toward either officer during the nine-minute confrontation, WXII reported. The affidavit also states neither officer attempted to restrain Lakey during those nine minutes, despite several opportunities and the fact that Lakey was not fully conscious. “(The victim) is tased numerous times while merely lying naked in the ditch, presumably for not rolling onto his stomach and complying with the officers’ commands to ‘Put your hands behind your back’,” the affidavit states. Court records state Lakey died of “complications of myocardial infarction (clinical) in the setting of cardiomegaly and critical coronary atherosclerosis and law enforcement use of electrical weapon and restraint,” The Ardmoreite reported. The arrest warrants for Dingman and Taylor were issued Wednesday, and both officers surrendered to the Carter County Sheriff’s Office Thursday morning, WXII reported. Both men face 10 years to life in prison if convicted, and both were granted $250,000 bond.
  • What is more important -- global health policy, or where to display a unicorn drawing? That was the pointed issue confronting a BBC broadcaster on Monday, who was interviewing Clare Wenham, an assistant professor at the London School of Economics. Of course, the unicorn won out Wenham, speaking virtually with Christian Fraser, was about to answer a question about the United Kingdom’s response to the coronavirus pandemic when her daughter, Scarlett, entered the picture, The New York Times reported. The young girl can be seen walking back and forth in the room, trying to decide where to put her drawing. When Wenham finished her answer, Fraser asked, “What is your daughter called?” “She’s called Scarlett,” Wenham said. “Scarlett, I think it looks better on the lower shelf,” Fraser said. “And it’s a lovely unicorn.” As Fraser started to ask another question, Scarlett interrupted. “Say, what’s his name?” the child asked. “What’s his name, Mummy?” Fraser had a good laugh and quipped, “This is the most informative interview I’ve done all day.” Wenham told the BBC it was ironic that her interview had been crashed. She said she recently wrote an article for the British Medical Journal on that topic. Wenham conceded, however, that she never thought that scenario would happen to her. Reaction was mostly positive, with Twitter users complimenting both Wenham and Fraser. “Wonderful to see the realities of homeworking for parents,” Heather de Gruyther wrote. “And thank you to the presenter for making it OK and for talking to the child too.” The interview was similar to a 2017 clip that went viral when Robert Kelly, a political-science professor at Pusan National University in South Korea, was interrupted by his children and wife during his interview with the BBC, the Times reported.
  • A naked man was rescued from a sewer in downtown Duluth on Thursday, officials said. Officials in the northern Minnesota city said first responders pulled the man to safety around 5:10 p.m., KBJR reported. It was not clear why the man was naked, or why he was in the sewer. The rescue comes after authorities received a report about a man who had entered a manhole Wednesday afternoon, the television station reported. The man’s clothes were found near the manhole, city officials said. After ending their search Wednesday, first responders returned Thursday after receiving a report about a man yelling for help from under a manhole cover, the Duluth News Tribune reported. Firefighters lifted the manhole and found a man “visibly in distress,” according to a news release from the city of Duluth. Firefighters placed a ladder down the manhole. The man, who has not been identified, was able to climb out, the News Tribune reported. He was taken to an area hospital, where he was treated for hypothermia, the newspaper reported.