ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

clear-night
58°
Sunny
H 64° L 39°
  • clear-night
    58°
    Current Conditions
    Sunny. H 64° L 39°
  • clear-day
    64°
    Today
    Sunny. H 64° L 39°
  • clear-day
    68°
    Tomorrow
    Sunny. H 68° L 42°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Wsb news on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Wsb traffic on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Wsb weather on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

Personal Finance
Credit card issuers trim benefits: See who’s cutting what
Close

Credit card issuers trim benefits: See who’s cutting what

Credit card issuers trim benefits: See who’s cutting what

Credit card issuers trim benefits: See who’s cutting what

There’s an old Chinese saying, “One day, a thousand autumns” that indicates a pace of rapid change. That saying is certainly appropriate right now with what’s going on in the credit card industry.

Since the start of 2018, three major credit card issuers — Discover, Citi and Chase — have pulled back credit card benefits (and eliminated them altogether in some cases) one right after the other.

RELATED: How I paid off my $86,000 mortgage in 2 years

These credit card benefits are on the endangered list

Discover was the first issuer to kick off the cutting back of benefits. At the end of February, Discover eliminated five credit card benefits, citing “prolonged low usage” of benefits such as Extended Product Warranty and Return Guarantee, among others.

Their move was followed by Citi. Earlier this month, Citi announced that it would be drastically pruning the limits on its damage and theft purchase protection for cardholders and its Citi Price Rewind program, among others, starting later this month.

The latter program was beloved by cardholders because it would pay you the difference if a purchase you made was later found advertised at a lower price.

Then just a week after Citi’s announcement, Chase got into the action with its plan to stop offering both Price Protection and Return Protection to customers, effective August 26.

Here’s a detailed look at exactly what’s going away or being reduced and by whom:

Discover

Discover eliminated the following benefits as of February 28, 2018:

  • Extended Product Warranty
  • Return Guarantee
  • Purchase Protection
  • Auto Rental Insurance
  • Flight Accident Insurance

After initially announcing it would keep its popular Price Protection feature, Discover has abruptly changed course and said the benefit will now get the axe on October 31, 2018. That’s right ahead of the holiday shopping season.

Currently, this free benefit refunds the difference up to $500 on eligible items if you find a lower price at any store within 90 days of purchase. So use it while you still got it!

You can see the complete list of remaining benefits at Discover.com/benefits.

Citi

Beginning on July 29, Citi will reduce its benefits for cardholders in the following ways:

Damage and theft purchase protection

  • $1,000 coverage per stolen or damaged item — down from $10,000
  • 90 days to file a claim — down from 120 days
  • Exclusions apply to purchases of firearms, ammunition and jewelry, among other items

Citi Price Rewind program

  • Benefit capped at $200 per item going forward — down from $500
  • Annual maximum refunds capped at $1,000 — down from $2,500
  • Exclusion apply to items such as tires, firearms and ammunition, among others
  • Cheaper warehouse club prices will be barred from consideration for this program

Worldwide car rental insurance

  • Exclusion apply to charges or expenses for the loss of use of the rental car, rental agency fees or taxes

Trip cancellation and interruption protection

  • Benefit reduced to a maximum of $1,500 per trip — down from $5,000
  • Total calendar year cap of $5,000 for this benefit

90-day return protection

  • Exclusions include firearms, ammunition and furniture, among other items

See the complete list of benefit changes going into effect later this month at CardBenefits.Citi.com/Guide3.

Chase

Starting July 29, Chase will eliminate two key benefits:

Price Protection

See above for an explanation of this popular type of credit card benefit.

Return Protection

This program that is soon going the way of the dodo would reimburse customers (up to $250 for each eligible item) on purchases they later regret that merchants refuse to take back. Currently, there’s a $1,000 annual maximum on this — but it all goes away come August 26.

Meanwhile, to balance things out, Chase’s announcement about the benefits changes did include one bright spot: Cardholders will soon get Trip Cancellation/Interruption Insurance added to their accounts, to the tune of up to $1,500 per person and $6,000 per trip for pre-paid, non-refundable passenger fares.

What about other major credit card companies?

There have been no similar announcements of wholesale reductions or outright cuts in credit card benefits from American Express, Bank of America or Capital One. But we’ll keep our eye and update you if any news does break regarding these other credit card companies!

More credit card stories on Clark.com:

Read More

News

  • A Florida man is facing child sex abuse charges after officials said he paid over $800 on an Uber to bring a teenage girl to Apopka. >> Read more trending news Police said 25-year-old Richard Brown raped the 17-year-old girl in his parents' home over the course of several days. The two met over Instagram after he told the victim that he was a 19-year-old Instagram celebrity and that he would 'take care of her.' The victim told Apopka police that Brown paid for an Uber to drive her from San Antonio, Texas, to Baton Rouge, Louisiana. In Louisiana, she got into another Uber that dropped her off in Apopka on Sunday. Brown would later show police receipts showing the second part of the trip that amounted to over $800. According to arrest documents, Brown told police he was 'only friends' with the victim and thought that she was of age and 'in need of a place to stay.' One neighbor couldn't believe the accusations. 'You might never know about it and now the cops are here,' said Amanda Trail. 'That's crazy for the parents.' The victim said once she realized Brown wasn't 19 or 'Instagram famous' that she wanted to go home. Brown then allegedly told her, 'no you owe me now for bringing you all the way here.' She later told officials that she escaped on Wednesday when Brown fell asleep and while she was on Snapchat with her mother. Police would locate her near Ustler and Wekiwa Preserve Drive, but said she wasn't able to point out which home belonged to the victim or what his name was on social media.  Brown's attorney took issue with the story, citing 'several inconsistencies.' Brown faces six felony counts of child sex abuse. 
  • A jury has acquitted Michael Rosfeld Friday night in the trial of the white former police officer who shot and killed an unarmed black teen fleeing a high-stakes traffic stop outside Pittsburgh. >> WPXI LIVE UPDATES: Michael Rosfeld Trial Rosfeld was charged with homicide for shooting Antwon Rose Jr. during a traffic stop last June. Rose was riding in an unlicensed taxi that had been involved in a drive-by shooting when Rosfeld pulled the car over and shot the 17-year-old in the back, arm and side of the face as he ran away. The panel of seven men and five women — including three black jurors — saw video of the fatal confrontation, which showed Rose falling to the ground after being hit. The acquittal came after fewer than four hours of deliberations on the fourth day of the trial. The Rose family’s attorney, S. Lee Merritt, had urged a murder conviction, saying before closing arguments that it’s “pretty obvious” Rose was not a threat to Rosfeld. Rose’s death — one of many high-profile killings of black men and teens by white police officers in recent years — spurred protests in the Pittsburgh area last year, including a late-night march that shut down a major highway. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
  • A photo taken of a mother and daughter on the flight deck of an Atlanta-bound Delta Boeing 757 has gone viral. >> Read more trending news The duo, Capt. Wendy Rexon and First Officer Kelly Rexon, can be seen smiling ear-to-ear at the helm of the duel-engine Boeing 757, which seats around 170 passengers. The photo was taken by Dr. John R. Watret, the chancellor of Embry-Riddle Worldwide, a world-renowned aeronautical university, who just happened to overhear that there was a mother-daughter flight crew. According to a release from the university, Watret, who was a passenger on the flight, overheard a mother and kids coming from the cockpit talking about the “mother and daughter” flying the passenger airliner. “I thought that was amazing. I was in awe. I asked if I could visit them, too,” he said in the press release.   This was especially meaningful for Watret because of Embry-Riddle’s commitment to creating more opportunities for women in all areas of the aviation industry. “There has to be more diversification in the industry. It’s crucial and one of the key factors we focus on. When there are more opportunities, everyone wins,” Watret said in the release. Delta airlines official twitter account also replied to his tweet: Kelly Rexon’s sister is also a pilot, according to the release from Embry-Riddle.
  • Tulsa firefighters have returned a cat to its owner after it hitched a ride in a car for about 100 miles. Officials said they were called to rescue a cat but quickly learned it wasn't 'your typical cat stuck in a tree call.' They believe the cat jumped into the car's undercarriage in Mustang, Oklahoma, and likely rode along near the engine. The driver said he heard a noise that he thought was his child's video game, but it turned out to be the meowing cat. >> Read more trending news Firefighters made calls to the Mustang area to see if anyone had reported a lost cat and eventually found the family. They drove up to Tulsa on Friday to collect the cat, whose name is Snickers. KOKI-TV was at the fire station Friday for the reunion.
  • Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms said in a letter on Friday that the city council’s attempt to have her administration investigated for potentially misusing city funds to hire her campaign staff was itself unlawful. Bottoms specifically pointed to a sentence in a resolution that the council approved on Monday that authorized the ethics officer and auditor to hire an outside law firm to assist with an investigation. “A grant of authority to hire legal counsel, such as is contained in the Resolution, violates the City of Atlanta Charter,” Bottoms wrote. “The Charter designates the City Attorney as the chief legal advisor of the city.” The letter represents an escalation of a power struggle over the mayor and city council’s respective roles to help restore public trust amid an ongoing federal probe into corruption at city hall. The resolution requesting the investigation came in response to an Atlanta Journal-Constitution article published last weekend. The article found that six Bottoms campaign staff members were issued payments for a pay period in December 2017, before the city had formally offered them jobs. That article reported that political supporters of the mayor were given job titles based on desired salaries, not their job qualifications or responsibilities. And it found that Bottoms’ former campaign manager Marva Lewis was briefly made an Airport Deputy General Manager and received payments out of airport funds, in possible violation of FAA regulations. The council resolution approved on Monday requested that the auditor and ethics office to determine if the manner in which campaign staff were hired violated city code, state law, the state constitution or Federal Aviation Administration regulations. City Auditor Amanda Noble confirmed to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Friday that she and the ethics office had initiated an investigation. Noble declined to address the contents of Bottoms’ letter. Council President Felicia Moore said resolution was not a binding order, but an expression of the council’s will to see the matter reviewed by the city’s oversight officers. She said the auditor and ethics officer are independent and have the discretion to investigate matters of their choosing. “The law department may have to assist in their getting outside counsel,” Moore said. “The reality is that neither the ethics officer nor the auditor need the council’s resolution to conduct a review.” Moore said one could read the resolution’s call for the ability to hire outside counsel as an implied request for the city’s law department to cooperate with the investigation. The law department, at least in theory, reports to both the mayor and the council. Bottoms has until early next week to decide if she will sign the proposal or veto it. If she doesn’t act eight days after it was passed, the resolution is automatically adopted. The mayor’s letter, which mentions a possible veto, was itself a veiled threat that she may take such action against a resolution that she claims violates the city’s charter. The letter itself seemed to be a preemptive attempt to call into question an investigation, which she claims grew out of a resolution that violates the city’s charter, would be allowed to move forward. Bottoms said that because of the resolution the auditors and ethics officer’s findings “would be rendered useless due to their unlawful origin.” Moore sees no reason why an investigation shouldn’t move forward. “As far as them doing their review and having the access to all city records, there should be no reason why that would change,” Moore said. “They already have the authority.”
  • Here is the letter Barr sent to leaders in Congress after he received the results of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible Russian Collusion during the 2016 presidential election. Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins: I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with “a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General” or acting Attorney General “concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.” 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3). There were no such instances during the Special Counsel’s investigation. The Special Counsel has submitted to me today a “confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions” he has reached, as required by 28 C.F.R. 600.8(c). I am reviewing the report and anticipate that I may be in a position to advise you of the Special Counsel’s principal conclusions as soon as this weekend. Separately, I intend to consult with Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and Special Counsel Mueller to determine what other information from the report can be released to Congress and the public consistent with the law, including the Special Counsel regulations, and the Department’s long-standing practices and policies. I remain committed to as much transparency as possible, and I will keep you informed as to the status of my review. Finally, the Special Counsel regulations provide that “the Attorney General may determine that public release of” this notification “would be in the public interest.” 28 C.F.R. 600.9(c) I have so determined, and I will disclose this letter to the public after delivering it to you. Sincerely, William P. Barr Attorney General