Chance of Rain
H 61° L 42°
  • cloudy-day
    Current Conditions
    Chance of Rain. H 61° L 42°
  • heavy-rain-day
    Chance of Rain. H 61° L 42°
  • clear-day
    Sunny. H 63° L 39°

Wsb news on-demand

00:00 | 00:00


Wsb traffic on-demand

00:00 | 00:00


Wsb weather on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

National Govt & Politics
Attorney General Sessions testimony - as it happens

Attorney General Sessions testimony - as it happens

Attorney General Sessions testimony - as it happens
Photo Credit: Jamie Dupree

Attorney General Sessions testimony - as it happens

Amid questions about the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 elections and the firing of former FBI Director James Comey, Attorney General Jeff Sessions is on Capitol Hill before the Senate Intelligence Committee, getting a chance to tell his side of the story in a public session, as Sessions told his former colleagues in no uncertain terms that he did not collude with Russia or have knowledge of any Russian election meddling.

Here is a rundown of today's hearing:

5:06 pm - Chairman Burr asks Sessions to go back and see if he can work with the White House to allow responses to Senators' questions on subjects where Sessions refused to give answers.

5:03 pm - Wrapping up questioning for Democrats, Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) raises red flags again about Sessions not answering a number of questions.

5:00 pm - Asked by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) about Russian foreign policy goals, Sessions sounds like he's back in his old job as Senator, saying Russian hostile actions are in many ways a threat. But asked if he raised concerns about Russian election interference, Sessions doesn't recall discussions about that.

4:54 pm - Sessions continues to say that his advice was given based on the Hillary Clinton investigation; Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) suggests that was a cover story to paper over the reason stated by President Trump, that Comey was fired because of the Russia probe.

4:48 pm - Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) using his time to bolster the case against James Comey, based on his handling of the Hillary Clinton investigation. Sessions said the background was "stunning" in how Comey mishandled that probe.

4:43 pm - Once again, a line of questioning by Harris has drawn criticism from other GOP Senators.

4:41 pm - Pressed by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), Sessions again defends his refusal to answer certain questions about his conversations with President Trump. But he doesn't really outline why, other than a general argument that top officials should not reveal details of talks with the President.

4:36 pm - As Chairman Burr tells Sessions that "we are very much focused on Russia's involvement," fellow Republican Sen. Jim Risch (R-ID) is heard saying, "Doesn't seem like it."


4:33 pm - Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) chides Democrats over the hearing, saying none of them have asked today about any collusion involving President Trump, as he said critics of the President are going down all sorts of "rabbit trails"

4:25 pm - Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) again asks Sessions why he has never received a briefing on the Russian interference; Sessions says it's very important to investigate what the Russians did, because there may have been an impact on the election.

4:19 pm - Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) sticks up for Sessions: "You speak as a man eager to set the record straight." Lankford compares Sessions to former AG Eric Holder, whom he says didn't turn over documents and cooperate.

4:13 pm - Sessions says the President has not asserted executive privilege; Sen. Angus King (I-ME) asks why Sessions is not answering certain questions.

4:11 pm - Sessions acknowledges that he has not received a briefing about the Russia investigation.

4:07 pm - Sessions gets a very friendly line of questioning from Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO).

4:01 pm - Asked by Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM) if he is invoking executive privilege, Sessions says, "It would be inappropriate" to share private conversations with the President.

3:59 pm - Sessions says Comey should have spoken with then Acting Deputy Attorney General Dana Boente, about any concerns with conversations involving President Trump.

3:58 pm - Sessions says he does not regret being involved in the decision to fire Comey, "I think I had a duty to do so."

3:54 pm - Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) bores in on what Sessions did on the Comey firing.

3:52 pm - Sessions gets mad at Wyden, as Wyden asks about Comey's statement last week, that there was something "problematic" that would require Sessions to recuse himself.

Here is the video from last week, with Comey hinting at some kind of secret reason why Sessions would be recusing himself. This is what Sessions is getting mad about.

3:51 pm - Sessions says he basically recused himself on his very first day as Attorney General, because he did not look at any materials related to the Russia probe.

3:49 pm - Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) says there is no legal basis for "stonewalling" by Sessions and other officials when asked direct questions by lawmakers on the Russia probe. Sessions fires back: "I am not stonewalling."

3:46 pm - Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) takes Sessions back through an Oval Office meeting where the President had Comey stay behind. Sessions also asked about Trump recording conversations in the White House; "I don't know," Sessions says of possible recordings.

3:41 pm - Pressed by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Sessions cites Comey's work during the investigation of the Hillary Clinton email question - "it was my best judgment that a fresh start at the FBI was the appropriate thing to do," as Sessions said it was the right decision to fire Comey.

3:39 pm - Sessions says he is not able to discuss, confirm or deny questions of what they spoke about with President Trump when it comes to Comey's dismissal as FBI Director.

3:37 pm - Sessions says he never heard anyone on the Trump campaign say anything about Russian involvement in 2016. Asked if he would have left the campaign upon getting that news, Sessions said "maybe." That was quickly noted by Democrats watching on TV.

3:35 pm - Sessions says he can absolutely say that he had no conversations with any Russian officials, says there was no hint of help coming from Moscow, as he says the underlying investigation is a "serious matter."

3:34 pm - Sessions again says it is "absolutely false" that he colluded at all with the Russians during the 2016 campaign.

3:23 pm - Sessions is asked about potential pardons by President Trump; Sessions says he can't talk about such matters. Not clear if he has had such a discussion with Mr. Trump.

3:20 pm - Sessions is asked by Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) if the President is thinking about removing Robert Mueller as Special Counsel; Sessions says he knows nothing about those reports.

3:14 pm - Sessions says he did not recuse himself from the Russia investigation because he was the focus of any investigation - rather it was because of his involvement in the Trump Campaign.

3:09 pm - The Q&A begins after a very strong statement from Attorney General Sessions.

3:07 pm - Sessions: false attacks, innuendo, and leaks will "not intimidate me."

3:02 pm - Sessions giving no ground in his opening statement, flatly denying that he has done anything to interfere in the Russian investigation.

2:58 pm - Sessions says any suggestion that he was part of Russian collusion was an "appalling and detestable lie"

2:56 pm - Sessions foreshadows that he will not talk about private conversations with President Trump. The Attorney General also denies

2:54 pm - After opening statements from the top members of each party, Attorney General Sessions takes the oath and begins his statement.

2:45 pm - Intelligence Committee chairman Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC) rattles off four main questions for Sessions, focusing on contacts with Russia officials and any role in the firing of Comey. Burr says he wants a "candid and honest" discussion.

2:42 pm - The gavel is down. Toe meets leather.

2:40 pm - To the sounds of clicking shutters from still photographers, Attorney General Jeff Sessions arrives in the hearing room and walks to the witness table.

2:33 pm - We may see some tough questions from Democrats, who weren't pleased with Sessions leaving the Senate and becoming the Attorney General in the first place.

2:27 pm - What kind of questions might get asked of Sessions? Look back to Comey's testimony from last week, and that gives us some clues.

2:26 pm - This hearing may get started a few minutes late, as the Senate is now taking a vote on the floor. Sessions is no stranger to this committee room, Hart 216, which has been used in a number of high profile events over the years. Last week, Senators heard from Comey in this same spot.

Read More


  • In addition to computers, phones, software and other tech products, Apple has announced it will soon offer its own credit card: the Apple Card. >> Read more trending news  The tech giant introduced Apple Card, created in partnership with Mastercard and Goldman Sachs, at its “show time” services event Monday, in Cupertino, California, The Verge reported. Apple CEO Tim Cook touted Apple Card as, “the most significant change in the credit card experience in 50 years.' Apple Card will be available on all iOS devices in the Wallet app and is set for release this summer. Customers who want a physical card can get an optional “laser-etched titanium rectangle,” CNN reported. Unlike traditional credit cards, Apple Card comes with no card number, CVV security code or expiration date. Purchases are instead authenticated with a fingerprint or face-identification. The new card will also offer a rewards system known as Daily Cash, in which 2 percent of any Apple Pay purchase goes directly back to the Apple wallet as cash. The deposits are made daily, and the reward goes up to 3 percent for purchases of Apple products and down to 1 percent for purchases made with the physical card, according to CNN. Apple said the card has no late fees or increased interest rates for late payments, but The Verge noted, “We’ll read the fine details to see if there are limits.” Some speculate Apple Card is meant to encourage use of Apple Pay, which Cook said Monday is only accepted by 70 percent of U.S. retailers, as opposed to 99 percent of retailers in Australia. “They’re really nudging consumers toward using Apple Pay on a regular basis and not just as an occasional thing when a retailer allows,” Sara Rathner, a credit card expert at personal finance company NerdWallet, told The Verge. More information on Apple Card can be found here.
  • The price of vaping in Washington could soon skyrocket if a proposed 60 percent tax is passed by lawmakers. >> Read more trending news  'It's like being told, ‘We're going to put a new tax on your favorite pizza.’ No! Don't do that!” said Jim Music. Washington lawmakers introduced HB 1873. It would add a 60 percent tax to vapor products, which is similar to tobacco, KIRO-TV reported. Currently vape isn’t taxed. Vapor store owner Joshua Baba said vape is different than tobacco and the price hike would force many shops to close their doors. 'Sixty percent, we owe that to the state just all of a sudden? That's crazy. That does put me out of business,” he said. Standing in the rain, Monday afternoon a small group held signs and gathered to protest. “Those kind of numbers are scary to somebody. I go through a couple bottles of vapor juice a week and that's going to double my cost,” said Music. A new Washington State Health Youth survey shows e-cigarettes and vaping are on the rise. Thirty percent of high school seniors said they use vapor products, which is up from 20 percent in 2016. State Rep. Gerry Pollet proposed the House bill. He wants to see the numbers drop and believes a tax is the ticket. “E-cigarettes and vaping products are dirt cheap, you won't believe how cheap they are,' he said. “A pack of cigarettes in the state of Washington, on average, costs about a little more than $8. Vaping the same amount of nicotine will cost you about $2.' Lawmakers believe the tax will drop youth vaping by 25 percent. Others find that hard to believe.  “This tax isn't going to change where the kids are getting it or how they're getting it, but it is going to change, in a negative way, the lives of a lot of shop owners and a lot of product users that are fully in compliance with the law,” said Music. Pollet said the 60 percent tax would eventually raise as much $30 million per year. The money would be used to fund programs that work to prevent teens from vaping.
  • A Monday morning British Airways flight scheduled to fly from London, England, to Dusseldorf, Germany, accidentally went to Edinburgh, Scotland, instead. >> Read more trending news  The error has been attributed to an incorrect flight plan filed by WDL Aviation, which operated the flight on behalf of British Airways, USA Today reported. This led the pilot and cabin crew to believe the flight was bound for Edinburgh. Air traffic controllers followed the same flight plan and saw nothing amiss, British Airways officials told The Associated Press. Zsófia Szabó, a passenger on the flight, told CNN she noticed something may have been amiss when she saw mountains outside the cabin window instead of the “usual German landscape.” A coworker brought up Google Maps on their phone, she said, and noted the plane was in Scotland. 'When we landed there was a bit of a hilarious moment when the flight attendant asked for a show of hands for the people going to Dusseldorf, which turned out to be everyone,' Szabó said. The pilot apologized to passengers, then announced the plane would refuel and head to Dusseldorf. Most passengers didn’t seem mad about the situation and instead found it funny, Szabó said. Why an incorrect flight path was filed remains unclear. 'We are working with WDL Aviation, who operated this flight on behalf of British Airways, to establish why the incorrect flight plan was filed. We have apologized to customers for this interruption to their journey and will deal with them all individually. Customers are on route to Dusseldorf currently,” British Airways spokesman Chip Garner said in a statement. WDL Aviation said they’re also investigating the incident: “We are working closely with the authorities to investigate how the obviously unfortunate mix-up of flight schedules could occur,' said WDL spokesperson Joachim Schöttes. “At no time has the safety of passengers been compromised. We flew the passengers on the flight with number BA3271 to Dusseldorf after the involuntary stopover in Edinburgh.” The Associated Press contributed to this report.
  • In a move that has surprised some, mixed martial arts fighter Conor “The Notorious” McGregor has announced his retirement from the sport via Twitter. >> Read more trending news  “Hey guys quick announcement,” McGregor tweeted late Monday. “I’ve decided to retire from the sport formally known as ‘Mixed Martial Art’ today. I wish all my old colleagues well going forward in competition. I now join my former partners on this venture, already in retirement. Proper Pina Coladas on me fellas!” The 30-year-old fighter, originally from Dublin, Ireland, is a two division UFC world champion and two division Cage Warriors World Champion. He’s ranked No. 2 lightweight champion and No. 9 pound for pound champion in the UFC, according to Fox Sports. Yahoo Sports reported the announcement came as a surprise, and that McGregor may “just be trying to get an upper hand in a negotiation.” McGregor appeared Monday on The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon and made no mention of retiring, MMA Fighting reported. He talked of fighting this summer. “We’re in talks for July,” McGregor told Fallon. “So we’ll see what happens. A lot of politics going on. The fight game is a mad game. But again, like I said, and to my fans, I am in shape and I am ready.” Some fans on Twitter seemed unconvinced of the news. “Last time he said this he fought twice in the next 6 months,” tweeted @BishopSportsNet. UFC hasn’t yet commented on McGregor’s announcement.
  • Now that the Gronk's officially hanging up his cleats -- fans are left wondering what he'll do next. >> Read more trending news  Patriots tight end Rob Gronkowski announced on Instagram that he is retiring from football following the team's Super Bowl LIII win, ending his historic nine-year NFL career, Boston 25 News reported. What he'll do after is up in the air, though some say he might go down the wrestling road. In fact, he has dabbled in it before with an appearance at WrestleMania 33 -- stepping in the ring to help his real-life friend Mojo Rawley during the Andre The Giant Memorial Battle Royal. And many fans were hoping to see Gronk at TD Garden on Monday night, where WWE Raw was taking place. He did not make an appearance, but fans in Boston are excited to see what he'll take on next regardless a cameo at the Garden.  'Oh yeah he’s an entertainer,' said Patriots fan, Josh Lima. 'He’s funny, you know he’s either gonna be an actor or wrestler.' Public relations executive and Emerson professor, David Gerzof Richard, thinks Gronk sure has the personality and brand for it in his post-NFL career. 'He has his own brand of being the happy-go-lucky tight end, it's really leveraging that and with various people he is interacting with on both Instagram and Twitter and leveraging into what comes next,' said Richard.  Richard says sports stars in previous decades didn't have the social media star power -- or social media at all -- to build off of like Gronk. 'The worst thing he could do is go silent... and that is something I don't think we are going to see from Rob Gronkowski,' adds Richard. And his fans certainly hope he'll find a way to stay successful in the public eye. 'I think he should go into movies because he's a pretty funny guy and people look up to him,' said Patriots fan, Donte Tyler from Stoughton. Another fan thinks so too, and she thinks comedy would be the only way to go.  'I don't know about a serious ... maybe in a comedy or something,' another fan said. 'What would it be called? Maybe Adam Sandler and Gronk go on vacation.' As for the wresting, a WWE spokesperson gave no comment on any potential deals or announcements.
  • A metro Atlanta family said an airline crew told their two sons they’d have to get off a plane after a dispute over one of the boys’ severe peanut allergies, WSB-TV reported. >> Read more trending news  The boys were traveling from Atlanta to Manila, where their father is based on a temporary job, according to the news station. Rakesh Patel said his 15-year-old and 16-year-old sons were traveling by themselves after visiting their sick grandfather. The family told WSB-TV they let Delta Air Lines know ahead of time that the teen had a peanut allergy. Delta made sure that on the first leg of the flight, from Atlanta to Seoul, no peanuts were served, WSB reported.  However, things were different on the second leg of their flight. When the boys went to board their flight from Seoul to Manila on Delta’s skyteam partner Korean Air, the boys were told there would be peanuts served on board, the news station reported.  According to the family, the crew said they were not going to deprive other guests of peanuts and presented the teens with two options: deal with the peanuts or get off the flight.  When the son with allergies asked for another option, the boys were forcibly removed from the plane and stranded in Seoul, their father confirmed. They took a return flight to Atlanta, the family told WSB. Patel said he filed a complaint with the airline and asked for a refund.  In a statement, Delta apologized to the Patel family for the ordeal, “particularly during what is already a difficult time for them.”  “Delta and our partner Korean Air are communicating with the family and examining the processes surrounding this incident; we will use our findings in our work to create a consistent experience for customers flying Delta and our partner airlines,” the statement said. >> Trending: Giant alligator sneaks up on golfers, lumbers across links, plops down near 17th hole  A statement from Korean Air read, in part: “Korean Air is aware that peanut and food allergies are an industry issue and no airline can guarantee a food allergy-free environment. But we are reviewing ways to deal with this issue in a safe and feasible way. We totally understand the risks faced by passengers with nut and food allergies and will certainly try to accommodate them better in the future.”