H 65° L 46°
  • cloudy-day
    Current Conditions
    Clear. H 65° L 46°
  • clear-day
    Clear. H 65° L 46°
  • cloudy-day
    Partly Cloudy. H 69° L 42°

Wsb news on-demand

00:00 | 00:00


Wsb traffic on-demand

00:00 | 00:00


Wsb weather on-demand

00:00 | 00:00

2 Investigates: Fake agency targeting teens for nude modeling

2 Investigates: Fake agency targeting teens for nude modeling

2 Investigates: Fake agency targeting teens for nude modeling
Photo Credit: WSB-TV
U.S. Postal Inspection Service inspector Yulunda Burns told Channel 2's Jodie Fleischer that the sender could spend up to five years in jail.

2 Investigates: Fake agency targeting teens for nude modeling

It's a mystery one local family has been trying to unravel for months now: Is their teenage son the victim of an elaborate prank or a child predator?

Channel 2 investigative reporter Jodie Fleischer tried to get to the bottom of that question, and discovered that even federal agents aren't sure. But investigators with the United States Postal Inspection Service were so interested, they opened a preliminary case to examine the evidence.

Most 14 year olds don't receive much mail, especially an unsolicited letter in an envelope stamped 'confidential' in red ink, with printed labels from a modeling agency named 'S&M'.

"This is sick. This is just...Something's wrong," said a Gwinnett County mom who didn't want to be identified.

She still isn't sure who targeted her teenage son, explicitly mentioning his name in each of the letters.

The letter was sent to at least 15 freshmen at Parkview High School in Lilburn.

"That scared me. Like, he's a minor... there's no way my son would be doing any 'artistic nude' photo shoots," the mother said.

The letter says her son would be launching his modeling career with revealing photos, and invites his classmates to show up and watch. But the letter lists no location. Two photos included in the letter are lifted from the Internet.

"My thought was number one, it's either some kind of pervert who is trying to get photos or it's some child at school playing a prank," the mother said.

Fleischer tried to find out which. First, she drove to the return address listed on the envelope. It's a real modeling agency for kids in northwest Atlanta.

"Oh it's absurd. It's crazy, it's insane and we don't know why," said Eva Stancil, owner and operator of Kiddin' Around, the real modeling agency at that address, “Who is the victim here? Is it the boy or is it us?"

Stancil had already seen the letters when several showed up in her mailbox marked return to sender. She also heard from an angry father.

"He thought that 'S&M' may be a division of Kiddin' Around – which let me get this perfectly clear – it is not," said Stancil, who had already contacted the Atlanta Police Department.

"The police basically told me there was nothing they can do," said Stancil.

But Fleischer also showed the letters and envelopes to investigators with the United States Postal Inspection Service.

"By them using someone else's address, it could be to lure children to a destination for child exploitation, or it could have just been an elaborate prank, but whatever the case is, just the use of this address alone is illegal," said inspector Yulanda Burns.

Burns said, if caught, the sender could end up in prison for up to five years.

The envelopes have identifying codes on the outside, but the best clues may be inside the unopened letters. For example, DNA from whoever sealed them, or fingerprints on the letter inside. Burns did not want to comment specifically regarding the agency's investigative tools.

"There is a lot of evidence that can be gathered, so we will conduct a preliminary investigation to see what we can find out, to see who is responsible for this," said Burns.


Some of the boy's friends asked him about the letter on Twitter and several parents called his mother. She told Fleischer she's relieved that her son handled it so well.

"He's very confident. He's a very good, outgoing kid and so for him it was, trying to play a prank on me and I'm not worried about it because my friends know who I am,'" the mother said.

But she also wonders how the sender knew where the teens live. Parkview had not yet published its student directory for this school year, but all of the students attended eighth-grade together at Trickum Middle School last year, and were listed in that directory. It includes students' names, phone numbers, and home addresses.

"I never thought about it before. I would have never thought anything of it when I signed the little slip that says my child's name can be in the directory," said the mom, adding that she never would have imagined it could be used for something like this letter.

"It was child porn. I think that if it was a student, I think the school needs to be aware. If it is an adult, I'd like to see them in prison," the mother said.

She wonders how a 14-year-old would have been able to print and mail so many letters without a parent noticing.

There was also an earlier business-style letter sent to four of the boy's adult relatives, about a month before this letter was sent to all of the teens. Investigators think it's less likely a child would have done that as part of a prank, and the earlier letter used the mom's legal name, which she says her close friends don't even know.

"That kind of frightens me a little bit. My gut says it had to be somebody who would know that information because it's not readily used," said the mom, adding that her son knows all of the kids who were mailed the letter, but several are outside of his friend group.

Postal inspectors intend to reach out to the teens who received the letter, and the school.

"It may be a prank, but it's not funny, not at all, because real children were used, a real business was used," said Burns.

Read More


  • A Gwinnett County family is trying to make sense of the murder of their husband and father outside their home in a Buford subdivision overnight Thursday. The victim, identified as 43-year-old George Young, was shot dead right outside his own front door. He had just come home from working a security job and his keys were still in the front door when he was shot twice. “I heard two loud gunshots,” says his wife Tia. “At first, I thought it was gunshots, but I wasn’t sure what it was. I wasn’t sure if it was firecrackers.” Her brother, who was asleep on the couch, heard it too. He opened the door to find Young lying on the front porch. “I never heard a car speed off. My brother didn’t either,” says Tia. Gwinnett Police detectives told the woman it does not appear to have been a robbery. “We don’t know where the gunshots came from--whether they came from the porch or came from the street. But our ultimate motive, right now, is to figure out what other people heard,” says Cpl. Michele Pihera. She is asking anyone with information to come forward to police. Tia and her husband had been married close to 23 years and she wonders how she will continue alone raising their three sons. “I lost my dad a few years back to suicide, and I didn’t think it could any worse. But losing a spouse like this, I think it tops that,” she says.
  • His book called gay people 'vile.' Now, a federal judge says she may rule within the next month whether the city of Atlanta fired its fire chief over his religious views.  Kelvin Cochran lost his job in January of 2015, after self-publishing the book 'Who Told You That You Were Naked?' It includes passages that referred to homosexuality as 'vile, vulgar and inappropriate' and akin to 'bestiality.' When concern was raised about the book in late November 2014, Cochran was suspended for 30 days. His lawyer, Kevin Theriot, contends the chief was punished for his religious faith, but attorneys for the city argued that it was Cochran's actions during his suspension while an investigation was underway that got him ousted. City lawyer David Gevertz pointed out that Cochran had been directed to not make public comments about his suspension, but instead helped launch a PR campaign with the Georgia Baptist Convention that resulted in thousands of angry e-mails being sent to City Hall. 'We did not fire Chief Cochran because of his religious beliefs,' said Atlanta Chief Counsel Robert Godfrey. 'It was about trust. It was about his campaign to have people contact the mayor and things like that afterwards.' Theriot contends that Mayor Kasim Reed's public statements and social media posts contradict that, including one in which Reed made clear that he did not share the anti-gay views expressed in Cochran's book. The lawsuit points out that there were 'zero instances of discrimination' by Cochran against any employees, and so Theriot says the rest of what the city says is a pretext. 'There are a few isolated passages that they take out of context to try to depict Chief as being hateful, when in fact, Chief Cochran's beliefs require him to treat everybody equally--and the only evidence before the court is that what he always did,' says Theriot. Theriot acknowledged that some copies of Cochran's book were given to men on the job, but he insists they were from people who asked for it and/or shared similar beliefs as the chief. Gevertz pointed out in court that the book created a hostile work environment and could leave the city open to lawsuits from disgruntled employees or unsuccessful candidates once the views of Cochran, a member of the mayor's cabinet, were known publicly. Cochran's lawsuit seeks back pay after his suspension and termination, as well as reinstatement. He has also filed a separate complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Cochran says his childhood dream was to become a fire chief, and he says the discrimination and racial slurs experienced in his early years working in Louisiana combined to make him vow that if he were ever in a position of authority, no one would face discrimination because they were a minority under his leadership. Yet, he says, that is why the city terminated him. 'I was shocked that writing a book encouraging Christian men to be the husbands and fathers and men that God had called us to be would jeopardize my 34-year career,' said Cochran on Friday. 'It's still unthinkable to me that the very faith and patriotism that inspired my professional achievements and drove me to treat all people with love, equity, and justice, are actually what the government used to end my childhood dream-come-true career. 'In the United States of America, true tolerance should be a two-way street for all Americans,' Cochran continued. 'No one deserves to be marginalized or driven out of their profession because of their faith.' U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May grilled lawyers on both sides with questions about the cases they cited in support of their arguments, and says she will write a detailed analysis and likely issue a ruling in about three weeks. The attorneys are seeking summary judgment, meaning they are asking the judge to decide the case. If she cannot rule on every issue raised, says Judge May, the Cochran case will go to trial on the ones she cannot resolve, putting the questions in the hands of a jury. A trial would likely be held next spring. Any jury pool will likely include some people like Tonya Ditty, who tells WSB that she has been a longtime supporter of Cochran since the case began in 2014. She attended Friday's hearing and says she was also at a rally at the state Capitol for him. Ditty says she is concerned about 'the trampling of religious rights,' no matter what religion. 'When our Founders wrote the Bill of Rights, they did not pick a religion,' says Ditty. 'This is fitting for everyone. I think that often is said that, 'Oh, the Christians just want protection.' This is for any religion. I don't think it's ever been stated that we are trying just to protect Christians.' Ditty, who says she is a Christian, says people of faith are being stifled. 'I either have to live out my faith in church or in my home, but dare me come out into the marketplace of ideas, and then I'm under attack,' she says.
  • Mass shootings have been becoming more common in America, with one happening nearly every week. But have you considered what to do if you're in a dangerous situation with someone opening fire and attacking you?  >> Read more trending news The U.S. Department of Homeland Security released a video recommending 'run, hide, fight' for active shooter situations. WPXI sat down with security expert Terrence Brown, who trains people and companies on how to handle emergencies. 'So, running's fine, but the issue with running ... is that you need to know where you're running to,' said Brown. Brown is retired from the U.S. military and is a former Pittsburgh police officer. He said a lot of people instinctively 'fight, flight and freeze' in a crisis, which is understandable, but not good. 'You're fighting yourself. You're in disbelief that this is actually happening,' said Brown. Brown said it's important to be prepared and have a plan. That means before running, you should identify a safe place to shelter. David Johnson and Brown walked through WPXI, with Brown identifying what to look for: rooms and doors with no glass, and rooms that open to the inside, so they can be barricaded against an intruder. When it comes to going to large outdoor events, it's just as important to be prepared. 'Get to know the areas, get to know the buildings that will be open late,' said Brown. 'To my right, I see a parking garage ... multiple levels, so that's wonderful.' Good places to run and hide are thick and solid, and don't have glass. That provides you safety from someone firing a gun at ground level or from up above. And when you're at an event where everyone is focused on one thing, like a performer, force yourself to look away and scan the crowd every once in a while. Brown said it's all about awareness, whether in your workplace, in any other building or outdoors, especially where there are large crowds.  As for the last recommendation, fight, that's for when all else fails. In that case, you're trying to save your life, and the lives of others, in any way you can.
  • A Montana congressman misled investigators about his assault on a reporter the day before he was elected and claimed that the 'liberal media' was 'trying to make a story' out of it, according to documents released Friday.U.S. Rep. Greg Gianforte, a Republican, told an officer in the aftermath of the attack that Guardian newspaper reporter Ben Jacobs had grabbed him by the wrist and pulled both of them to the floor, according to notes from a Gallatin County sheriff's officer who interviewed the politician the night of the attack.Multiple witnesses contradicted that account, and Gianforte later pleaded guilty to misdemeanor assault. The attack occurred the day before his victory in a May 25 special election, by which time many voters already had cast ballots by mail.More than 100 pages of documents, photos and audio from the investigation were released under a court order following requests from The Associated Press and other news organizations.The documents include interviews with members of a Fox News crew who were in the room with Gianforte and Jacobs at the politician's Bozeman campaign office. They said Gianforte became enraged over what he perceived as biased coverage before body-slamming Jacobs, throwing him to the ground and punching him.Gianforte staffer Josh Elle — the candidate's driver — told investigators that he was in an adjacent room when he heard a commotion and looked into the interview room. Elle told investigators that Gianforte appeared to be striking the reporter with closed fists before someone in the room closed the door.Another worker said Gianforte and others on the campaign had been complaining earlier in the day about 'duplicitous' campaign coverage by the Guardian and Buzzfeed.Gianforte told Sgt. Scott Secor in an interview that Jacobs had interrupted as the Fox crew set up for an interview and 'started interrogating in a very intensive way.'I probably shouldn't do it but I reached out for his phone ... he grabbed my wrist, he spun and we ended up on the floor ... so he pulled me down on top of him,' the sergeant quoted Gianforte as saying.In the hours after the assault, Gianforte's campaign spokesman, Shane Scanlon, issued a statement that also blamed the attack on Jacobs, saying the reporter had grabbed the candidate's wrist. The records released Friday show that Gianforte first gave the misleading account to authorities.He didn't appear in public until his victory party the next night, when some in the crowd cheered him over the confrontation. Gianforte publicly apologized to Jacobs and told supporters he wasn't proud of his actions.His spokesman, Travis Hall, insisted on Friday that the documents contained 'nothing new.'No one was misled, and anyone who says otherwise is mistaken. Greg took responsibility for his actions and is focused on serving the people of Montana,' Hall said in an emailed statement.Gallatin County Attorney Marty Lambert said he was aware of Gianforte's comments to investigators but did not consider additional charges such as obstruction of justice because authorities were focused on the assault allegation.'When the police are investigating a case, suspects of crimes will say misleading things, and apparently that's exactly what happened here on the part of both Mr. Gianforte and his campaign,' Lambert said.'It is not a crime per se to lie to the cops,' added Lambert, a Republican. 'The main thing here is he was charged with assaulting Ben Jacobs and pled guilty to that.'Gianforte paid a $385 fine and completed 40 hours of community service and 20 hours of anger management counseling. He also donated $50,000 to the Committee to Protect Journalists.The assault happened too late in the campaign to affect the outcome of the election to replace Ryan Zinke, who resigned to become President Donald Trump's Interior Department secretary.Gianforte is up for re-election next year and has filed to run. Six Democrats have lined up to challenge him.The congressman unsuccessfully fought a judge's order for him to be booked by law enforcement and photographed like other defendants. In October, Gallatin County District Judge Holly Brown ordered the release of Gianforte's mug shot, which is sure to be used as fodder by Democrats in the run-up to the election.__Follow Matthew Brown on Twitter at www.twitter.com/matthewbrownap .
  • Update (Friday, November 17) President Donald Trump said in a tweet Friday he’s delaying a new policy allowing the body parts of African elephants shot for sport to be imported until he can review “all conservation facts.” The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said Thursday that it will allow the importation of body parts from African elephants shot for sport. The agency said encouraging wealthy big-game hunters to kill the threatened species would help raise money for conservation programs. Animal rights advocates and environmental groups criticized the decision. On Friday, the Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee urged the administration to reverse the policy, calling it the “wrong move at the wrong time.” Trump said that the policy had been “under study for years.” He says he will review the issue with Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. Earlier The Trump administration plans to lift a ban on Friday that barred big game hunters from bringing trophies from elephants killed in a pair of African nations to America, according to multiple reports. >> Read more trending news A spokesperson for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service told ABC News in a statement Wednesday that the decision was made after officials in Zimbabwe and Zambia provided them with information to support a reversal of the ban. 'Legal, well-regulated sport hunting as part of a sound management program can benefit the conservation of certain species by providing incentives to local communities to conserve the species and by putting much-needed revenue back into conservation,' the spokesperson told ABC News. The decision will overturn a 2014 ban implemented by President Barack Obama’s administration in response to falling elephant populations.  African elephants are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. A provision in the act, however, allows for the government to give permits that let people import trophies from such animals if evidence shows that hunting them helps conservation efforts, according to NBC News. The rule reversal will apply to elephants hunted in Zimbabwe from Jan. 21, 2016, to Dec. 31, 2018, the news station reported. It will also apply to elephants killed in Zambia in 2016, 2017 and 2018 and “applications that meet all other applicable permitting requirements,” a Fish and Wildlife spokesperson told NBC News. According to the 2016 Great Elephant Census, Savanna elephant populations fell by 30 percent between 2007 and 2014. About 352,000 elephants were spotted during the survey, 82,300 in Zimbabwe and 21,700 in Zambia. Both countries had areas that saw substantial declines in elephant populations along the Zambezi river in Zambia and in Zimbabwe’s Sebungwe region, according to the census. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
  • The Latest on a plan to allow importation of elephant parts (all times local):7:55 p.m.President Donald Trump says he's delaying a new policy allowing the body parts of African elephants shot for sport to be imported until he can review 'all conservation facts.'The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said Thursday that it will allow the importation of body parts from African elephants shot for sport. The agency said encouraging wealthy big-game hunters to kill the threatened species would help raise money for conservation programs.Animal rights advocates and environmental groups criticized the decision. On Friday, the Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee urged the administration to reverse the policy, calling it the 'wrong move at the wrong time.'Trump tweeted that the policy had been 'under study for years.' He says he will review the issue with Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke.___1:40 p.m.The top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee is calling on the Trump administration to reverse its new policy allowing importation of body parts from African elephants shot for sport, labeling it the 'wrong move at the wrong time.'California Rep. Ed Royce is questioning the action because of concerns not only about African wildlife but U.S. national security, citing the political upheaval in Zimbabwe,.The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said in a written notice issued Thursday that permitting elephants from Zimbabwe and Zambia to be brought back as trophies will raise money for conservation programs.Royce says that when carefully regulated, conservation hunts could help the wildlife population, but 'this is the wrong move at the wrong time.